- Refer To The Ex 1 (43.85 KiB) Viewed 42 times
B. Check the access list for log hits.
C. Check the routing table for 212.50.185.126.
D. Remove any two of the set clauses. (Multiple set clause entries will cause PBR to use the routing table.)
Refer to the exhibit. Based upon the configuration, you need to understand why the policy routing match counts are not i
-
answerhappygod
- Site Admin
- Posts: 899604
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am
Refer to the exhibit. Based upon the configuration, you need to understand why the policy routing match counts are not i
Refer to the exhibit. Based upon the configuration, you need to understand why the policy routing match counts are not increasing. Which would be the first logical step to take?
A. Confirm if there are other problematic route-map statements that precede divert.
B. Check the access list for log hits.
C. Check the routing table for 212.50.185.126.
D. Remove any two of the set clauses. (Multiple set clause entries will cause PBR to use the routing table.)
A. Confirm if there are other problematic route-map statements that precede divert.
B. Check the access list for log hits.
C. Check the routing table for 212.50.185.126.
D. Remove any two of the set clauses. (Multiple set clause entries will cause PBR to use the routing table.)
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!