Refer to the exhibit. Given the output from the show ip eigrp topology command, which router is the feasible successor?
A. 10.1.0.1 (Serial0), from 10.1.0.1, Send flag is 0x0 Composite metric is (46152000/41640000), Route is Internal Vector metric: Minimum bandwidth is 64 Kbit Total delay is 45000 Microseconds Reliability is 255/255 Load is 1/255 Minimum MTU is 1500 Hop count is 2
B. 10.0.0.2 (Serial0.1), from 10.0.0.2, Send flag is 0x0 Composite metric is (53973248/128256), Route is Internal Vector Metric: Minimum bandwidth is 48 Kbit Total delay is 25000 Microseconds Reliability is 255/255 Load is 1/255 Minimum MTU is 1500 Hop count is 1
C. 10.1.0.3 (Serial0), from 10.1.0.3, Send flag is 0x0 Composite metric is (46866176/46354176), Route is Internal Vector metric: Minimum bandwidth is 56 Kbit Total delay is 45000 microseconds Reliability is 255/255 Load is 1/255 Minimum MTU is 1500 Hop count is 2
D. 10.1.1.1 (Serial0.1), from 10.1.1.1, Send flag is 0x0 Composite metric is (46763776/46251776), Route is External Vector metric: Minimum bandwidth is 56 Kbit Total delay is 41000 microseconds Reliability is 255/255 Load is 1/255 Minimum MTU is 1500 Hop count is 2
Refer to the exhibit. Given the output from the show ip eigrp topology command, which router is the feasible successor?
-
answerhappygod
- Site Admin
- Posts: 899604
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am
Refer to the exhibit. Given the output from the show ip eigrp topology command, which router is the feasible successor?
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!