Traditionally, people have defined someone who is intelligent as an individual who can solve problems, use logic to answ

[answerhappygod]

Traditionally, people have defined someone who is intelligent asan individual who can solve problems, use logic to answerquestions, and think critically. One criticism of Gardner’s theoryis that he classifies talents as a type of intelligence. Criticsmight say that a talented dancer or chess player is not necessarilysmart. But psychologist Howard Gardner has a much broaderdefinition of intelligence. How would you reply to this criticism?How have his ideas changed the way we assess the strengths andweaknesses of people?