In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accom

[answerhappygod]

In A Study Of High School Students At Least 16 Years Of Age Researchers Obtained Survey Results Summarized In The Accom 1 (27.37 KiB) Viewed 104 times

In A Study Of High School Students At Least 16 Years Of Age Researchers Obtained Survey Results Summarized In The Accom 2 (16.85 KiB) Viewed 104 times

In A Study Of High School Students At Least 16 Years Of Age Researchers Obtained Survey Results Summarized In The Accom 3 (44.67 KiB) Viewed 104 times

In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other? Click the icon to view the table of survey results. Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. H₂ H₂ Determine the test statistic -(Round to two decimal places as needed.) Determine the P-value of the test statistic P-value = (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Do the results suggest that texting while driving and driving while drinking are related? OA Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are not related. OB. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to be somehow related
OA Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are not related. OB. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to be somehow related. OC. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. OD. Fall to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. 20 Am
pol students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table. Use a 0.05 st the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors. other? view the table of survey results. atistic o ded e of t to the st that the nu ing wh Survey Results Texted While Driving No Texting While Driving Print Drove When Drinking Alcohol? Yes No 726 3041 157 4578 Done - X of independenc endence betwee ll hyp and driving wrie orinking alconior. mhose two risky Denaviors appear to be somenow Terated. ull hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time w drinking alcohol. the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of while drinking alcohol.