in a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accom

[answerhappygod]

In A Study Of High School Students At Least 16 Years Of Age Researchers Obtained Survey Results Summarized In The Accom 1 (23.52 KiB) Viewed 85 times

In A Study Of High School Students At Least 16 Years Of Age Researchers Obtained Survey Results Summarized In The Accom 2 (13.96 KiB) Viewed 85 times

In A Study Of High School Students At Least 16 Years Of Age Researchers Obtained Survey Results Summarized In The Accom 3 (27.6 KiB) Viewed 85 times

In A Study Of High School Students At Least 16 Years Of Age Researchers Obtained Survey Results Summarized In The Accom 4 (10.53 KiB) Viewed 85 times

in a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other? Click the loon to view the table of survey results. Determine the null and atemative hypotheses Mo: H₂: Determine the test static Round to two decimal places as needed) Determine the P-value of the test statistic P-value (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Do the results suggest that texding while driving and driving while drinking are related? OA Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. OB. Fall to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol OC. Fall to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are not related O Reint the nu hunthesis There is suffrient evidence at a 005 sinnifeanen Invel to warrant minction of the claim of indenendanne hetween textinn while drivinn and drivinn while drinking alenhel Those
Do the results suggest that texting while driving and driving while drinking are related? OA Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. OB. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. OC Fall to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol Those two risky behaviors are not related OD. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two ricky behaviors appear to be somehow related Time Remaining: 02:30:16 Next
ding while driving and driving when drinking alcohol, Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other? Click the icon to view the table of survey results mermine the test statistic (Round to two decimal places as needed) ermine the P-value of the test static (Round to three decimal places as need the results suggest that texting while driving and c Survey Results Texted While Driving No Texting While Driving Print Drove When Drinking Alcohol? Yes No 723 157 Done 3059 4571 - X Reject the nut hypothesis. There is sufficient d while drinking alcohol. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sumen avsce to warrant repletion of the cent till text wird univing happeres % of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. Fal to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are not related Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to be somehow related Time Remaining: 02:30:10 Next
A study conducted in a small company yielded the results shown in the following table Age Insurance No Insurance The expected number of people who have insurance from the "45-65 age group in OA 17 477 OB 260 less than 25 13 18 OC. none of the other answers OD. 0.004% RE 14 CREED 25-45 57 30 45-65 14 17