- In A Study Of High School Students At Least 16 Years Of Age Researchers Obtained Survey Results Summarized In The Accom 1 (95.78 KiB) Viewed 101 times
- In A Study Of High School Students At Least 16 Years Of Age Researchers Obtained Survey Results Summarized In The Accom 2 (89.48 KiB) Viewed 101 times
- In A Study Of High School Students At Least 16 Years Of Age Researchers Obtained Survey Results Summarized In The Accom 3 (98.11 KiB) Viewed 101 times
- In A Study Of High School Students At Least 16 Years Of Age Researchers Obtained Survey Results Summarized In The Accom 4 (92.73 KiB) Viewed 101 times
In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other? Click the icon to view the table of survey results. Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. Ho: H₁: Determine the test statistic. x² = (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Determine the P-value of the test statistic. P-value = (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Do the results suggest that texting while driving and driving while drink Survey Results Texted While Driving No Texting While Driving Drove When Drinking Alcohol? Yes No 731 3049 4486 159 Print O A. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.0 somehow related. OB. Fall to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidenc OC. Fall to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidenc not related. O D. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. X Done riving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to be drinking alcohol. ving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are
In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other? Click the icon to view the table of survey results. Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. Ho: H₂: Dete Texting while driving is independent of all other risky behaviors. Texting while driving is independent of driving while drinking alcohol. Texting while driving and other risky behaviors are dependent. Texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol are dependent. O A. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of Independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to be somehow related. Dete P-va G Do tl OB. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. O C. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are not related. OD. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol.
In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving when drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other? Click the icon to view the table of survey results. Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. Ho: H₁: Dete x² = Dete P-val Do tl OA Texting while driving is independent of driving while drinking alcohol. Texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol are dependent. Texting while driving is independent of all other risky behaviors. Texting while driving and other risky behaviors are dependent. vel to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to be OB. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. O C. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors are not related. O D. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. ESTE TE