The paradox that the rod had no initial angular velocity yet it had a translational velocity is explained by the fact th
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2022 12:07 pm
The paradox that the rod had no initial angular velocity yet ithad a translational velocity is explained by the fact that
A) when the rod hit the ground, then it stated rotatingabout point A
B) the rod actually had angular velocity but was stopped bythe ground at point B
C) when the rod hit the ground, then it stated rotatingabout point B
D) the rod actually had angular velocity but was stopped bythe ground at point A
A) when the rod hit the ground, then it stated rotatingabout point A
B) the rod actually had angular velocity but was stopped bythe ground at point B
C) when the rod hit the ground, then it stated rotatingabout point B
D) the rod actually had angular velocity but was stopped bythe ground at point A