The paradox that the rod had no initial angular velocity yet it had a translational velocity is explained by the fact th

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

The paradox that the rod had no initial angular velocity yet it had a translational velocity is explained by the fact th

Post by answerhappygod »

The paradox that the rod had no initial angular velocity yet ithad a translational velocity is explained by the fact that
A) when the rod hit the ground, then it stated rotatingabout point A
B) the rod actually had angular velocity but was stopped bythe ground at point B
C) when the rod hit the ground, then it stated rotatingabout point B
D) the rod actually had angular velocity but was stopped bythe ground at point A
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Questions & Answers”