Verklepet/pers 130 100 NO 60 40 20 Comparison of the method used PI (IMD) vs P!(Amigo) Controllers by discussing the con

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

Verklepet/pers 130 100 NO 60 40 20 Comparison of the method used PI (IMD) vs P!(Amigo) Controllers by discussing the con

Post by answerhappygod »

Verklepet Pers 130 100 No 60 40 20 Comparison Of The Method Used Pi Imd Vs P Amigo Controllers By Discussing The Con 1
Verklepet Pers 130 100 No 60 40 20 Comparison Of The Method Used Pi Imd Vs P Amigo Controllers By Discussing The Con 1 (29.2 KiB) Viewed 22 times
Verklepet/pers 130 100 NO 60 40 20 Comparison of the method used PI (IMD) vs P!(Amigo) Controllers by discussing the controller responses: Settling time, rise tine offset, decay ratio, overshoot and the control action aggressive. Variable input/output % of an IMD-method tuned Pl controller over PERRERERERE Time, 1 ) BARR Figure 9: Variable Ingat output % of an IMD-method tuned PI controller over time -PIN -WIN AV INI Verket/ 282292 120 100 60 40 20 Variable Input/output % of an Amigo-method tuned Pl controller over time •MARARVOORRAR Time 11 -PVIN -WON Figure 10 Variable loput output % of an Amigo-method ted PI controller over time
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply