Match the legal principle, legal concept, and/or legal test on the left with the correctly corresponding case law from t

[answerhappygod]

Match The Legal Principle Legal Concept And Or Legal Test On The Left With The Correctly Corresponding Case Law From T 1 (51.93 KiB) Viewed 16 times

Match The Legal Principle Legal Concept And Or Legal Test On The Left With The Correctly Corresponding Case Law From T 2 (45.79 KiB) Viewed 16 times

Match The Legal Principle Legal Concept And Or Legal Test On The Left With The Correctly Corresponding Case Law From T 3 (36.23 KiB) Viewed 16 times

Match the legal principle, legal concept, and/or legal test on the left with the correctly corresponding case law from the drop-down menu on the right. Choose the best answer and only select one case per principle/concept/test. NOTE: make sure to scroll down and view the entire list in the drop-down menu before making your selection. In this case it was determined that, for situations of negligent misstatements causing economic loss, a duty of care is owed where it is foreseeable that clients would rely on the advice of the professionals providing that advice; and, furthermore, that professionals are held to a higher standard. For this case, the courts determined that parties are able to exclude their liability, even for fundamental breach, This case clarifies the legal concept of "Invitation to Treat that they are simply invitations to potential customers to engage in the process of negotiation and, as part of the pre-negotiation process, invitations to treat have no legal effect. Choose... Choose... Choose... ÷

In this case, the concept of Breach of Contract is clarified as the courts determined that the breach was substantial enough to constitute discharge because the failure to perform was significant. The legal principle behind this case is strict liability: if a person's actions are inherently. dangerous, then the occupier is liable for any damage they cause, In this case, the concept is "Remoteness and the legal principle is: damages are recoverable for loss and damage which arise naturally from the breach in the ordinary course of this, or which were in the contemplation of the parties at the time they entered into the contract. Choose... This case challenged whether it is appropriate to expose professionals and other experts to considerably greater liability and used the Reasonable Foreseeability/Reasonable Reliance Test to reduce the scope of a representor's potentially infinite liability. Choose.... Choose.... This is a product liability case that enforces the legal principle that injury, no matter how substantial, does not guarantee that others will be Choose.... beld liable as negligence must still be proven. Choose +

This is a product liability case that enforces the legal principle that injury, no matter how substantial, does not guarantee that others will be Choose... held liable as negligence must still be proven. This case challenged whether it is appropriate to expose professionals and other experts to considerably greater liability and used the Reasonable Foreseeability/Reasonable Reliance Test to reduce the scope of a representor's potentially infinite liability, This case created a two-stage test for determining the existence of a duty of care. This case clarifies the courts position on mistake and rectification and how the courts will not accept mistake to rectify a contract unless it is clear that the parties both intended for the document to read a certain way. Choose... Choose... Choose... "