Interestingly, the Principlism approach to bioethics, medical, and healthcare ethics has its fair share of detractors, a

[answerhappygod]

Interestingly The Principlism Approach To Bioethics Medical And Healthcare Ethics Has Its Fair Share Of Detractors A 1 (82.24 KiB) Viewed 18 times

Interestingly, the Principlism approach to bioethics, medical, and healthcare ethics has its fair share of detractors, as you will learn by completing this assignment. INSTRUCTIONS For Assignment 5, I want you to read the through the articles listed below and respond to the following questions: 1 Detail the varied arguments against the use of Principlism to approach ethical dilemmas. What do the detractors say are the limitations of Principlism? What do they think Principlism fails to address, if anything? 2. Describe the arguments for the use of Principlism to handle ethical dilemmas in health care. What do proponents of Principlism claim as its strengths to justify its continued use? What do they see as its benefits? From their perspective, what kinds of questions/dilemmas does Principlism help to answer? 3. How would you reconcile the pros and cons of Principlism? Is there any common ground between the proponents and detractors of Principlism? ARTICLES (most of these articles are short) Beauchamp TL. Methods and principles in biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003; 29: 269- 274. - Gillon R. Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 2015; 41: 111-116. - Campbell AV. The virtues (and vices) of the four principles. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003; 29: 292- 296. - Gardiner P. A virtue ethics approach to moral dilemmas in medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003; 29:297-302. Rhodes R. Good and not so good medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 2015; 41: 71-74.