State the conclusion for this hypothesis test OA. Do not reject He. There is sufficient evidence at the a-001 level of s

[answerhappygod]

State The Conclusion For This Hypothesis Test Oa Do Not Reject He There Is Sufficient Evidence At The A 001 Level Of S 1 (26.06 KiB) Viewed 15 times

State The Conclusion For This Hypothesis Test Oa Do Not Reject He There Is Sufficient Evidence At The A 001 Level Of S 2 (40.58 KiB) Viewed 15 times

State The Conclusion For This Hypothesis Test Oa Do Not Reject He There Is Sufficient Evidence At The A 001 Level Of S 3 (40.58 KiB) Viewed 15 times

State the conclusion for this hypothesis test OA. Do not reject He. There is sufficient evidence at the a-001 level of significance to conclude that the difference is greater than 0 OB. Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the a 0.01 level of significance to conclude that the difference is greater than 0. OC. Do not reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence at the a-0.01 level of significance to conclude that the difference is greater than 0. OD. Reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence at the a-0.01 level of significance to conclude that the difference is greater than 0. (c) What do you think the results of this experiment imply about babies' ability to assess surprising behavior? OA. There is sufficient evidence that babies may have the ability to assess surprising behavior. Further experimentach should be performed OB. This experiment does not imply anything about babies' ability to assess surprising behavior because correlation does not imply causation OC. There is not sufficient evidence that babies have the ability to assess surprising behavior OD. There is sufficient evidence that babies have the ability to assess surprising behavior
This question: 6 pont possible In an experiment, 17 babies were asked to watch a cimber attempt to ascend a hill One occasions, the baby wins the cinter fall to make the dind Then, the baby wees va propune hall, or a hinderer toy preventing the dimber from making the ascent The toys wwe shown to each baby in a random fashion A second part of this experiment showed the cater spproach the helporty, which is t action, and then the climber approached the hinderie toy, which is a surprising action. The amount of me te baby watched each event was conded. The ween difference in the speed watching the cintes sppenach de toy versus watching the climber approach the helper toy was 125 seconds with a standard deviation of 1.76 seconds Complete pas (e) Brough (C) below Click the icon to view the table of critical values State the conclusion for this hypothesis test OA. Do not reject H, There is suficient evidence at the a-0.01 level of significance to conclude that the difference is greater than 0 OB. Reject H, There is sufficient evidence at the a 0.01 level of significance to conclude that the difference is greater than 0 OC. Do not reject He. There is not sufficient evidence at the a-001 levant significance to conclude that the difference is greater than OD. Reject Ho There is not sufficient evidence at the a-001 level of significance to conclude that the difference is greater than 0 (c) What do you think the results of this experiment imply about babies' ability to assess surprising behavior? OA. There is sufficient evidence that babies may have the ability to assess surprising behavior. Further experimentation should be performed OB. This experiment does not imply anything about babies' ability to assess surprising behavior because correlation does not imply causation OC. There is not sufficient evidence that babies have the ability to assess surprising behavior OD. There is sufficient evidence that babies have the ability to assess surprising behavior. Submit test