MISSED THIS? Read Section 15.4 (Pages 642 - 650); Watch KCV 15.4 The data below show the concentration of N₂O5 versus ti

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

MISSED THIS? Read Section 15.4 (Pages 642 - 650); Watch KCV 15.4 The data below show the concentration of N₂O5 versus ti

Post by answerhappygod »

Missed This Read Section 15 4 Pages 642 650 Watch Kcv 15 4 The Data Below Show The Concentration Of N O5 Versus Ti 1
Missed This Read Section 15 4 Pages 642 650 Watch Kcv 15 4 The Data Below Show The Concentration Of N O5 Versus Ti 1 (61.7 KiB) Viewed 13 times
MISSED THIS? Read Section 15.4 (Pages 642 - 650); Watch KCV 15.4 The data below show the concentration of N₂O5 versus time for the following reaction: N₂O5 (g) → NO3(g) + NO₂(g) Time (s) [N₂O5] (M) 0 1.000 25 0.822 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 0.677 0.557 0.458 0.377 0.310 0.255 0.210 ✓ Correct The rate law for this decomposition reaction is rate = k[N₂O5]" where k is the rate constant and n is the reaction order. Looking at the concentration change over time, you can see that the half-life of this reaction is constant, which indicates that it might be first order. To confirm this hypothesis, plot In [N₂05] vs. time. This plot generates a straight line, so the reaction must be first order in N₂O5. Part B k= Determine the value of the rate constant. Express the rate constant to three significant figures Part C IVE ΑΣΦ Submit Predict the concentration of N₂O5 at 270 s. [N₂O5] = Submit Request Answer Provide Feedback IVE ΑΣΦ Request Answer www ? 8-1 ? M Next >
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply