Question 31 4 pts Jamie Carlon Watson states that the definition of "exploitation" states nothing regarding its moral im

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

Question 31 4 pts Jamie Carlon Watson states that the definition of "exploitation" states nothing regarding its moral im

Post by answerhappygod »

Question 31 4 Pts Jamie Carlon Watson States That The Definition Of Exploitation States Nothing Regarding Its Moral Im 1
Question 31 4 Pts Jamie Carlon Watson States That The Definition Of Exploitation States Nothing Regarding Its Moral Im 1 (44.16 KiB) Viewed 12 times
Question 31 4 pts Jamie Carlon Watson states that the definition of "exploitation" states nothing regarding its moral impermissibility. She brings up an example of how "hiring employees, directing volunteers, and building houses all fall within the scope of colloquial phrases such as 'exploiting resources' and 'exploiting advantages' without implying negative moral implications." By this, she is arguing that... Exploitation is a useful tool to organize groups of people that will follow orders for insufficient financial return. Exploitation is not necessarily a bad thing, and is an efficient model for work dynamics. O Exploitation can be good or bad, depending on whether consent is given and both parties are satisfied. Anyone who has ever had a job is being exploited by their boss and they should quit in order to avoid a toxic environment.
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply