Construct a proof for the argument: P→ ¬Q, Q..P -P -Q Q new line new subproof No errors yet, but you haven't reached the

Post by **answerhappygod** » Tue Jul 05, 2022 10:26 am

: Construct A Proof For The Argument P Q Q P P Q Q New Line New Subproof No Errors Yet But You Haven T Reached The 1 (69.05 KiB) Viewed 9 times

Write a proof that can be verified on proof-checker
3 Problems
No Truth Tables
No Parse Tables
Just show direct proofs
Construct a proof for the argument: P→ ¬Q, Q..P -P -Q Q new line new subproof No errors yet, but you haven't reached the conclusion. check proof start over Construct a proof for the argument: ¬RP, P, Q. (PAQ) →S: RAS 2 ¬R → P 1 1 2 -P 3 4 Q (PAQ) → S I new line li+new subproof No errors yet, but you haven't reached the conclusion. check proof start over Construct a proof for the argument: (R → ¬P) ^ (¬S → ¬R), R: SA¬P (RP) ^ (¬S → ¬R) 1 2 R 3 4 (RP) P 1 Simplification 2, 3 Modus Ponens m I new line li+new subproof No errors yet, but you haven't reached the conclusion. check proof start over