The primary reason why classical economists believe that nominal shocks are not a significant determinant of the busines

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

The primary reason why classical economists believe that nominal shocks are not a significant determinant of the busines

Post by answerhappygod »

The Primary Reason Why Classical Economists Believe That Nominal Shocks Are Not A Significant Determinant Of The Busines 1
The Primary Reason Why Classical Economists Believe That Nominal Shocks Are Not A Significant Determinant Of The Busines 1 (11.38 KiB) Viewed 12 times
The primary reason why classical economists believe that nominal shocks are not a significant determinant of the business cycle is that they believe to adjust that markets are. implying that prices are O imperfectly competitive and inefficient; slow O imperfectly competitive and inefficient: quick O competitive and efficient; quick O competitive and efficient: slow
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Questions & Answers”