- Three Engineers Are Working In The Municipality As Inspectors For Newly Constructed Residential Buildings The Three Eng 1 (59.53 KiB) Viewed 156 times
- Three Engineers Are Working In The Municipality As Inspectors For Newly Constructed Residential Buildings The Three Eng 2 (38.17 KiB) Viewed 156 times
- Three Engineers Are Working In The Municipality As Inspectors For Newly Constructed Residential Buildings The Three Eng 3 (51.39 KiB) Viewed 156 times
- Three Engineers Are Working In The Municipality As Inspectors For Newly Constructed Residential Buildings The Three Eng 4 (51.39 KiB) Viewed 156 times
- Three Engineers Are Working In The Municipality As Inspectors For Newly Constructed Residential Buildings The Three Eng 5 (33.06 KiB) Viewed 156 times
NEW CASE, NO PREVIOUS VERSION 4. What actions should be taken by Engineer 1 based on the NSPE code of ethics? [Total 8 points) Write three actions based on the NSPE code of ethics and use applicable code items in code of ethics section I. Il and III (When using NSPE Canons, write the section number only and do not copy it.) What Engineer 1 should do in this to avoid having an ethical Based on applicable items in dilemma with his employer? NSPE code of ethics Action 11 12 pntd Answer of this section should be in the form of: Example : 1-2-c or ll- 1-2 or 1-1-b Based on item from sec 2 pnt Based on item from sec. It 2 pnt Based on item from secit 2 pnt What should Engineer 2 do in this to violation of code of ethics? Action 21 12 pnt) Answer of this section should be in the form of Example: 1-2-c Based on item from sec. t 2 pnt Based on item from sec. It 2 pnt Based on item from sec. It 2 pnt What should Engineer 3 do in this case to avoid harming the building residents or the owner? Action 3 12 pnt) The answer to this section should be in the form of Example: 1-2- Based on item from sec. 2 pnt Based on item from set. Ile 2 pnt Based on item from sec. H 2 pnt Page 3 of 4
NEW CASE, NO PREVIOUS VERSION GENG 215: Introduction to Ethics and Design Homework 1- Spring 2022 Case 1: Engineering Inspection Unit Due Date: 5 days updated for NEW SPE Code) Homework Rules Check to 1. This homework is an individual assignment. 2. Register your name in the homework list when you submit homework in class Late submissions after the due date will result in a 50% total point deduction each day 4. Students caught copying homework will receive no credit and parents will be notified 5. Copying or turning in identical homework sets is considered cheating and students will automatically receive a zero Part 1: Engineering ethics case of study Three engineers are working in the municipality as inspectors for newly constructed residential buildings. The three engineers can be listed as follows: 1. Engineer 1 is a civil engineer 2. Engineer 2 is an electrical engineer 3. Engineer 3 is a mechanical engineer The three engineers were assigned to an investigation case involving a building involving a court dispute between an Engineering Tech Company (ETC) and an owner. The inspection comments for each engineer can be summarized as follows: a Engineer 1: The building construction work was completed by ETC but with low safety standards and not as described in the design specifications (e.g. not confirmed with standards or municipality laws). It should be noted that Engineer I was working for ETC before joining the municipality. As a courtesy to ETC, as a former employer, Engineer 1 is considering modifying his comments in this Investigation to allow ETC to correct some issues in this building b. Engineer 2: the building's electrical alarm system (EAS) was not completed in accordance with engineering technical design drawings, but Engineer 2 was not fully ware of the design standard. Therefore, Engineer 2 was asking Engineer 1 about the wiring problem, due to Engineer 1 tong experience in the municipality Engineer 3: The elevator system (ES) was inspected and noted to tack the safety circuit les short-circuit in the emergency-stop circuit). This would cause the ES to overheat and bum the system. However, ETC requested Engineer 3 not to report the elevator system because they will be changing the whole elevator system next month. The final report should summarize the final decisions concluded by all engineers. Page 1 of 4
NEW CASE, NO PREVIOUS VERSION 4. What actions should be taken by Engineer 1 based on the NSP code of ethics Total points Write three actions based on the NSPE Code of ethics and use code items in code of ethics section Liland 1. (When using NSPE Canons, write the section sumber only and do not copy it) What Engineer 1 should do in this to avoid having an ethical Based on applicable items in dilemma with his employer? NSP code of ethics Action 11 12 p Awer of the ci haben the format Example: 1-2-cor Based on item from ec2pnt Based on item from sec. 2 pnt Based on item from c. 2 pnt What should Engineer 2 do in this to violation of code of ethics? Action 2 12 this section hout the forma comple: 12 Based on item front 2 pnt Based on item from cont Based on item from secit 2 pnt What should Engineer 3 do in this case to avoid harming the building residents or the owner? Action 31 This section should be the format Emple: 1-2- Based on item from t 2 pnt Based on item from * 2 pnt Based on item from ec2pnt Page 3 of 4