Suppose that we have observations Xij = Mi + tij, i=1,2,..., m, j = 1, 2, ..., n, where tij's are i.i.d._from N(0,1). We

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

Suppose that we have observations Xij = Mi + tij, i=1,2,..., m, j = 1, 2, ..., n, where tij's are i.i.d._from N(0,1). We

Post by answerhappygod »

Suppose That We Have Observations Xij Mi Tij I 1 2 M J 1 2 N Where Tij S Are I I D From N 0 1 We 1
Suppose That We Have Observations Xij Mi Tij I 1 2 M J 1 2 N Where Tij S Are I I D From N 0 1 We 1 (63.31 KiB) Viewed 38 times
SOLVE Q3 AND Q4 ASAP AND SEND ME THE SOLUTIONS STEP BY STEP
PLEASE.
I WILL RATE POSITIVE.
Suppose that we have observations Xij = Mi + tij, i=1,2,..., m, j = 1, 2, ..., n, where tij's are i.i.d._from N(0,1). We can see that the MLEs of parameters (141, H2, ...., Hlm) are (X1, X2, ..., Xm). 1. 1 . 2. 3. In the questions above, we see that the bias of this estimator depends on the choice of hyperparameters. To eliminate unnecessary bias, in practice we may want to estimate them directly from data. Find the MLEs o and 12. 4. We can get a new estimator of (H1, H2, ..., fem), by replacing hyperparame- ters 6 and 72 with MLEs Ộ and 12 in the existing Bayes estimator above. In literature, this is called empirical Bayes estimator. Compare the risks between the empirical Bayes estimator and MLE (X1, X2, ..., Xm) using a numerical simulation approach. (Hint: Consider scenarios such as small n large m, and small m large n.)
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply