Question no. 6 Are the increments of the stochastic process {X(t),t >0} defined in Ex- ample 2.1.6 independent? stationary? Justify. ALE
Example 2.1.6. Let Y be a random variable having a U(0,1) distribution. We define the stochastic process {X(t), t > 0} by X(t) = evt for t 20 The first-order density function of the process can be obtained by using Propo- sition 1.2.2 (see Example 1.2.6): dIn(/t) S(q;t) = fx(o)(x) = ſy (ln(x/t)) dar if xe (t, te) 2 Next, the mean EX (C) of the process at time t > 0 is given by E[X(t) = 5" ellt. 1 dy=t(e - 1) for > 0 or, equivalently, by E[X(t) = ("..dr = dir -tette-1) for 120
Finally, we have X(t)X(+ + 8) = e't.ex (t + s) = €2V +(t + 8) It follows that Rx{t,t + 3) = E[X(t)X(+ + x)) = Ele='t( + )) = t+8)¢?,! Vsto
101% ņe 2.5 Exercises 67 101% ņe 2.5 Exercises 67 Question no. 6 Are the increments of the stochastic process {X(t),t >0} defined in Ex- ample 2.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 899589
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am