Business Law: Exclusion Clause
Ranjit is a regular paying visitor to Thrillseekers Theme Park (TTP). On this particular visit, he breaks his arm when he is thrown from a ride because TTP has failed to properly maintain the safety belt. The camera he is holding is damaged beyond repair. When Ranjit seeks compensation, TTP denies liability. They highlight a clause printed on the back of his admission ticket and displayed on a notice at the ticket office which states: Thrillseekers Theme Park accepts no liability for any loss or injury to visitors however this may arise.
1. Can Ranjit rely on the doctrine of incorporation to challenge the exclusion clause under Malaysian Law?
2. Can Ranjit rely on the doctrine of construction/interpretation to challenge the exclusion clause under Malaysian Law?
Business Law: Exclusion Clause Ranjit is a regular paying visitor to Thrillseekers Theme Park (TTP). On this particular
-
answerhappygod
- Site Admin
- Posts: 899604
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am
Business Law: Exclusion Clause Ranjit is a regular paying visitor to Thrillseekers Theme Park (TTP). On this particular
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!