What is the relationship between the amount of time statistics students study per week and their final exam scores? The
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 899603
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am
What is the relationship between the amount of time statistics students study per week and their final exam scores? The
h. Interpret the slope of the regression line in the context of the question: O As x goes up, y goes up. The slope has no practical meaning since you cannot predict what any individual student will score on the final. O For every additional hichir per week students spend studying, they tend to score on averge 2.30 higher on the final exam. 1. Interpret the y-intercept in the context of the question: The average final exam score is predicted to be 60. Olf a student does not study at all, then that student will score 60 on the final exam. The best prediction for a student who doesn't study at all is that the student will score 60 on the final exam. The y-intercept has no practical meaning for this study.
Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 451 of the 580 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 415 of the 580 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.10 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answer Select an answer Select an answer H1: Select an answer Select an answer v Select an answer (please enter a decimal) (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic?v- (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. The p-value is ?va f. Based on this, we should Select an answer the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. The results are statistically insignificant at a -0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of the 580 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is higher than the proportion of the 580 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west. The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.10, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.