Consider the following transcript: "I was thinking (uh) of going to that {um} movie tonight". Which of the following pre

[correctanswer]

Consider The Following Transcript I Was Thinking Uh Of Going To That Um Movie Tonight Which Of The Following Pre 1 (24.17 KiB) Viewed 243 times

Consider The Following Transcript I Was Thinking Uh Of Going To That Um Movie Tonight Which Of The Following Pre 2 (20.88 KiB) Viewed 243 times

Consider The Following Transcript I Was Thinking Uh Of Going To That Um Movie Tonight Which Of The Following Pre 3 (29.14 KiB) Viewed 243 times

Consider The Following Transcript I Was Thinking Uh Of Going To That Um Movie Tonight Which Of The Following Pre 4 (31.58 KiB) Viewed 243 times

Consider the following transcript: "I was thinking (uh) of going to that {um} movie tonight". Which of the following predictions would be most consistent with Clark & Fox Tree (2002)? The delay before "of" should be longer than the delay before "movie". There should be no difference in the length of delay before "of" or "movie". The comprehender will respond to the statement with a try-marker. The delay before "of" should be shorter than the delay before "movie".
Suppose Tyler is telling Harshada about an event that happened recently. Harshada isn't sure she heard correctly, so she says: "This was yesterday?" What conversational device is this an example of? Restricted offer Self-initiated repair Open request Collateral interjection Restricted request 000
Suppose a researcher discovers that people are more likely to "twitch" their ears at the end of a turn-constructional unit (TCU) than elsewhere in a conversation. Does this entail that "ear- twitching" is intended as a communicative signal? No; if it was a communicative signal, it should be randomly distributed throughout the conversation. Yes; it is co-timed with other back-channels, which means it is intended as a communicative signal. Yes; it likely indexes lower cognitive load, which means it is intended as a communicative signal. No; it's possible that it indexes something else, like lower cognitive load.
Which of the following pieces of evidence--if true--would be most inconsistent with the view that language is shaped solely by a drive for efficiency? Languages with strict word order tend to lose case marking, because they convey redundant information. Color naming systems around the world tend to maximize within-category similarity, and across-category dissimilarity. Even in languages with strict word order, case marking is preserved to a greater extent when it is associated with a positive social bias. Languages with case marking tend to have more flexible word orders. Social biases (e.g., markers of social class) do not affect whether case marking is preserved.