- Table 2 Hazard Ratios And 95 Confidence Intervals For The Associations Of Indicators Of Diet Quality With 4 Year Incid 1 (118.56 KiB) Viewed 12 times
developing frailty over 4 years is which of the following given a
poor Healthy Eating Index diet in the crude model?
1.00
1.44
2.21
0.001
Looking at table 2, which of the following category of Healthy
Eating Index was used as the reference group in the analyses
presented in table 2?
Poor
None of the answers are correct
Medium
Good
The crude model of 100 kcal/day or lower of energy intake
supports the Heathy Eating Index findings?
true
false
Table 2. Hazard Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for the Associations of Indicators of Diet Quality with 4-Year Incidence of Frailty (by Accounting for Competing Risks of Death) in Robust or Pre-frail (n = 2154 or n = 2270, Respectively, in Competing Risk Analysis) Community-Dwelling Older Adults of the Health ABC Study Cohort Risk of developing frailty by accounting for competing risks of death Risk of developing frailty (4-y follow-up]e. (4-y follow-up). Variable Crude model Model 10 Model 2 Crude model Model 10 Model 2 Healthy Eating Index score Poor (<51) 2.21 (1.37-3.57)" 1.73 (1.05-2.84) 1.92 (1.17-3.17) 2.31 (1.43-3.73)*** 1.90 (1.17-3.11) 2.17 (1.26-3.43)** Medium (51-80) 1.44 (1.03-2.00)* 1.28 (0.91-1.80) 1.40 (0.99-1.98) 1.44 (1.04-2.00) 1.31 (0.94-1.83) 1.42 (1.02-1.99) Good (>80) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref) .001 P value for trend .032 .009 .001 .013 .004 Energy intake per 100 kcald lower intake 1.01 (0.99-1.03) 1.00 (0.98-1.02) 1.00 (0.98-1.02) 1.01 (0.99-1.03) 1.01 (0.99-1.03) 1.01 (0.99-1.03) Energy intake, kcal/d Q1: s1360.6 1.04 (0.75-1.44) 0.97 (0.70-1.35) 0.96 (0.69-1.34) 1.07 (0.77-1.48) 1.03 (0.74-1.44) 1.03 (0.73-1.43) Q2: 1360.7-1742.4 0.90 (0.64-1.27) 0.93 (0.66-1.32) 0.88 (0.62-1.24) 0.91 (0.65-1.28) 0.96 (0.68-1.37) 0.92 (0.64-1.31) Q3: 1742.5-2217.1 0.82 (0.58-1.16) 0.87 (0.62-1.24) 0.80 (0.56-1.14) 0.82 (0.58-1.16) 0.89 (0.62-1.26) 0.81 (0.57-1.16) 04: 22217.2 1.00 (Ret) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref) P value for trend .806 .885 .850 .694 .826 .849 Total protein intake per 10-g/d lower intake 1.08 (0.99-1.17) 1.05 (0.96-1.14) 1.06 (0.97-1.16) 1.07 (0.98-1.17) 1.05 (0.95-1.16) 1.06 (0.96-1.17) Total protein intake, g/d Q1: $57.16 1.31 (0.95-1.80) 1.18 (0.85-1.63) 1.24 (0.89-1.72) 1.23 (0.94-1.78) 1.19 (0.85-1.65) 1.22 (0.87-1.70) Q2: 57.17-64.18 0.78 (0.55-1.12) 0.72 (0.50-1.04) 0.75 (0.52-1.09) 0.78 (0.55-1.12) 0.73 (0.51-1.04) 0.75 (0.53-1.08) Q3: 64.19.73.19 0.87 (0.62-1.23) 0.83 (0.58-1.18) 0.82 (0.58-1.17) 0.88 (0.62-1.24) 0.84 (0.60-1.18) 0.83 (0.59-1.17) 04: 273.20 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref) .193 .535 P value for trend .330 243 .520 .400 Total protein intake <0.8 g/kg aBW per day 0.95 (0.72-1.24) 1.02 (0.76-1.37) 1.09 (0.82-1.47) 0.93 (0.71-1.22) 0.99 (0.74-1.31) 1.03 (0.77-1.37) Animal protein intake per 10-g/d lower intake 1.05 (0.96-1.13) 1.03 (0.94-1.12) 1.06 (0.96-1.15) 1.04 (0.96-1.13) 1.03 (0.94-1.13) 1.06 (0.96-1.17) Vegetable protein intake per 10-g'd lower intake 1.14 (0.93-1.39) 1.10 (0.89-1.36) 1.19 (0.94-1.50) 1.13 (0.91-1.41) 1.09 (0.85-1.40) 1.18 (0.89-1.55) Note. For risk of developing frailty (4-year follow-up), data are given as hazard ratio (95% confidence interval); for risk of developing frailty by accounting for competing risks of death (4-year follow-up), data are given as subdistribution hazard ratio (95% confidence interval). Abbreviations: aBW, adjusted body weight, Health ABC, Health, Aging, and Body Composition: Q, quartile, Ref, reference. *P<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001. Frailty status was categorized into robust score - Dof 5), pre-frail score - 1-2 of 5), and frail (score - 3 or greater of 5). Cases/total-269/2082 (differs from original sample size due to missing covariates). "Cases/total-458/2196 (differs from original sample size due to missing covariates). Adjusted for age, sex, race, study site, education level, income, living arrangement, smoking status, alcohol consumption, fat mass index, and energy intake. By using energy intake as the independent variable, models were not additionally adjusted for energy intake. Additionally adjusted for number of chronic diseases, estimated glomerular filtration rate, depression, cognitive function, and number of medications. Animal and vegetable protein were mutually adjusted. "The hazard ratio reflects the association for low less than 0.8 g/kg aBW per day) compared to high (0.8 or greater g/kg aw per day) protein intake.