- Is Fedit 100 33x Bhn 7 100 C Compared To The Suts Of 311 17 For 6061 T6 Aluminum Measured From A Standard Tensile Te 1 (84.58 KiB) Viewed 10 times
is fedit = 100-33X BHN 7=100 c) Compared to the Suts of 311+ 17 for 6061-T6 aluminum measured from a standard tensile te
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 899603
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am
is fedit = 100-33X BHN 7=100 c) Compared to the Suts of 311+ 17 for 6061-T6 aluminum measured from a standard tensile te
is fedit = 100-33X BHN 7=100 c) Compared to the Suts of 311+ 17 for 6061-T6 aluminum measured from a standard tensile test, the % difference between the tensile test measurement of Suts and the Brinell hardness estimated Suts S. From the hardness measurement, would you say S. that the material is 6061-T6 aluminum? Yes or No. Why or why not? d) There is some concern about the 2.5 mm impression left on the beam's surface by the Brinell hardness test. A Vicker's hardness (a.k.a diamond pyramid hardness) test is known to leave a smaller indentation on the material surface. Determine the size of the impression, L, if a Vicker's diamond pyramid at P-10 kg is used. Recall that BHN VHN and that 2P HV=VHN LP sina where 8 - 1369, then L- 2 PA112019 Damond pyramid = 136hcluded angle of faces mm. Figure 2 Schematic of Vickers Hardness Test e) Would the size of the Vicker's surface artifact (ie, indentation) for quality control be more acceptable than the Brinell surface artifact in situations, such as cyclic fatigue? Yes or No. and for the inverted Explain P INote that the depth of the hemispherical indentation from the Brinell test is - ( DBHN) pyramidical indentation from the Vicket's test is t-U17.)