Suppose that a city experiences a significant natural disaster, why might an economist argue that in the long-run there

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

Suppose that a city experiences a significant natural disaster, why might an economist argue that in the long-run there

Post by answerhappygod »

Suppose that a city experiences a significant natural disaster,
why might an economist argue that in the long-run there could be
benefits to the city rising out of the ashes of its immediate
tragedy? Be specific.
Then again, is suffering through a natural disaster necessary
for a city’s economic renaissance? Why or why not?
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Questions & Answers”