- Back Assignment 2 Help Guide Ne Critical Evaluation Of The Do Remember To Think About The Whole Project Full Life 1 (32.46 KiB) Viewed 96 times
- Back Assignment 2 Help Guide Ne Critical Evaluation Of The Do Remember To Think About The Whole Project Full Life 2 (36.75 KiB) Viewed 96 times
- Back Assignment 2 Help Guide Ne Critical Evaluation Of The Do Remember To Think About The Whole Project Full Life 3 (35.71 KiB) Viewed 96 times
< Back Assignment 2 help guide_ (ne... Critical evaluation of the Do remember to think about the whole project full life) use of PM methodology in the perfect start right through to the Digital Management Conference You might evaluate how the choppers project definition, project planning, scheduling communication stakeholder management, cous, risk & changes to soupe Try and avoid genetic dindon capismember cach project is unique se the related delivery consideration will be beige Deefget that you are trying to achieve specific objectives the Digital Management Conference project does you chosen methodology help achieve these Do ensure that you identify specific examples of your chosen methodology can actually be the delivery of the project - this is where you make the link back to taught PM methods og For higher marks do highlight pemilitatis amfit 33) of your chosen approach methodologer pooshiataigய பாயfailers approche methodology will repando en tenedoras this project ens tocador capacidades a better choice of xx In your conclariasamtarian tell ாக your key points and give your jouer why your approach and supporting methodology being benefit your project for Do use references to support your disciples Heport Readability Dochure that you peoofread your work Carefully consider the overall structure and flow of your discussion so that readability improve Do cnnture that your disculpas poble The report ble 14 line-spaced, 13 perife Times Romanor Arial Repert Structure Do we the PAD repos structure. You can find the PAD structure guidelines under the moment foodteck BREO Note: "Main Body' sa'a heading You will need to identify the appropriate healing and subheading that per in this section of your report Ensure that you include at least high quality deces books and journals use the online libean your open-meethan that to get a good mark Ensure that you follow the follow the Harvard referencing format and incorrectly in your port Add a bibliography for higher marka References 3
Scrum and DSDM and Agile feature/artefact examples Daily scrum meetings (Scrum) Sprint planning (Scrum) • Product owner (Scrum) . Product backlog (Scrum) • Workshops (DSDM) • Modelling (DSDM) Configuration management (DSOM) Link to the assessment criteria (note this not a proposed format, but content guidance): Assessment criteria Key Considerations Depth of knowledge and Decade a justificace rationale behind your choice of a systematic understanding Waterfall of Agile approach- no need for this to be lengthy, and of project management no need for a detailed comparisce between the two (PM) theory * methodologies You must demonstrate your knowledge of your chosen approach (Waterfall or Agile) and demonstrate how the taught methodologies support them (PRINCE2 PMBOK Waterfall or Scrum DSDM for Agle)-deily and analyse key features you think are relevant useful for the Digital Management Conference project. Note you can use bote PRINCE2 and I'MBOK examples for Waterfall or Scrum ad DSDM for Agile if you wish. However, it will likely be more straightforward for you to stick to one of these Try and limit the descriptions of your chosen approach and methodologies to one of two paragraphes in the froduction Marks are for analysis and evaluation Dee't try and cover a complete methodology eggal components, process, themes features of Prince2er Serum cleas that is necessary asked for Try on focus on these things that we most televant for the given project Make sure you spell the names of the methodologies cely es PRINCE2D prince it is an actory Use the terminology of your methodology, eg for PRINCE2 Project Brief, PID. For Agile, Sprint Scrum Master, Daily Scrum Meeting at Do use references to support your discussion examples Critical evaluation of the Do remember to think about the whole project (full lifecycle use of PM methodology in the project start-right through to closure the Digital Management Conference You might evaluate how the approach methodology project definition project planning scheduling.communication stakeholder mantement, costrik & changes to scope etc
Assignment 2: Help guide Key guidelines Students need to choose from either a Waterfall (sequential) or Agile (iterative) approach for this assignment • Justification of the chosen approach should be fairly brief. Students should identify specific features and processes which could enable the successful outcome of the project using the chosen approach/supporting methodology . The report should also identify any major limitations of the chosen approach (Waterfall or Agile/and supporting methodology for the project, contrasting where the other approach/an alternative methodology might offer better support (note: a general comparison of approaches/methodologies is not needed). ve How to link the chosen approach to othe taught methodologies As part of assignment 2students can demonstrate their knowledge of taught methodologies by highlighting specific artifacts/features that can positively support the delivery of their chosen Waterfall or Agile approach: Prince2 and PMBOK are equally applicable to a Waterfall delivery approach Scrum and DSDM are the most commonly adopted underlying methodologies for a mran Agile delivery approach Prince2 and PMBOK Waterfall feature/artefact examples • Project Initiation Document (Prince 2) . Product Description (Prince2) . Quality Register (Prince2) Enterprise environmental factors (PMBOK) • Stakeholder Register (PMBOK) • Project Charter (PMBOK)