So, if we want to guarantee that our error is within a tolerance of +0.001, we can choose n so that efc+1 (n+1)! < 0.001

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

So, if we want to guarantee that our error is within a tolerance of +0.001, we can choose n so that efc+1 (n+1)! < 0.001

Post by answerhappygod »

So If We Want To Guarantee That Our Error Is Within A Tolerance Of 0 001 We Can Choose N So That Efc 1 N 1 0 001 1
So If We Want To Guarantee That Our Error Is Within A Tolerance Of 0 001 We Can Choose N So That Efc 1 N 1 0 001 1 (54.66 KiB) Viewed 68 times
So, if we want to guarantee that our error is within a tolerance of +0.001, we can choose n so that efc+1 (n+1)! < 0.001 Here is a table of values in the case c= 1.5. (1.5) (n+1)! 06.722533605507097 15.0419002041303225 2 2.5209501020651612 30.9453562882744354 40.2836068864823307 50.07090172162058266 6 0.015193226061553426 70.0028487298865412674 80.0004747883144235446 n Notice that when n=8, we can guarantee that the remainder |R() is less than 0.001. (In fact, it's less than 0.0005.) This should agree pretty well with what you saw in Exercise 2. Notice that the theory doesn't say that the choice n= 7 isn't good enough, it just guarantees that n = 8 is. n = Exercise 5. Make a similar table for the interval (-1,1). Stop when n is large enough to guarantee that R, () <0.001 on this interval
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply