Looking at the independent sample t test -- Group statistics table, what was the mean health score for the Intro Psyc co

[answerhappygod]

Looking at the independent sample t test -- Group statistics
table, what was the mean health score for the Intro Psyc course?
Group of answer choices 7.33 7.53 6.13 6.27
2. According to the Correlations table, which two variables show
a significant negative correlation (Pearson correlation is
negative, Sig 2 tailed value is less than .05? (Hint: significant
correlations are signified by an asterisk) Group of answer choices
Age and Stress Age and Work Hours Stress and Health Caregiving and
Stress
3. According to the Correlations table, which two variables show
a significant positive correlation (Pearson correlation is
positive, Sig 2 tailed value is less than .05)? (Hint: significant
correlations are signified by an asterisk) Group of answer choices
Age and Sleep Units and Health Stress and Sleep Units and
Stress
4. Looking at the results of the independent sample t test –
Independent samples Test table, which variable was significantly
different between the courses (i.e., For which row (variable) was
the Sig (2-tailed) column to the right of the df column less than
.05, equal variances assumed)? Group of answer choices Age Units
Work Hours Stress Flag question: Question 11
5. Looking at the results of the ANOVA, which variable
significantly differed between formats (i.e., For which row
(variable) was the Sig column at the far right of the ANOVA table
less than .05)? Group of answer choices Age Units Work Hours
Stress
6. Looking at the results of the ANOVA, what was the F Ratio for
Stress? Group of answer choices 8.36 1.74 .303 1.95
7. Looking at the results of the Chi Square analysis (Course *
Gender Cross tabulation table), which course had more females than
males? Group of answer choices Intro Psyc Psyc Stats
8. Looking at the results of the Chi Square analysis (Chi Square
Tests table), what was the value of the Pearson Chi Square test
statistic? Group of answer choices 16.36 8.16 4.82 2.12
9. Looking at the results of the Chi Square analysis (Chi Square
Tests table), and according to the Pearson Chi Square test, was
there a significant relationship between Course and Gender (i.e.,
Was the Asymptotic significance (2 sided) for the Pearson
Chi-Square less than .05)? Group of answer choices Yes No
Frequency Table Frequency Table - Age - April 5, 2016 - Age Frequency 4 Percent Valid Cumulative Percent 4 2 6 4 1 em 18.00 19.00 20.00 21.00 22.00 23.00 24.00 25.00 26.00 29.00 30.00 31.00 39.00 44.00 Total 1 1 er 13.3 13.3 6.7 20.0 13.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 6.7 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent 13.3 13.3 6.7 20.0 13.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 6.7 3.3 100.0 13.3 26.7 33.3 53.3 66.7 70.0 73.3 76.7 80.0 83.3 86.7 90.0 96.7 100.0 1 erw 1 1 10 1 er 2 1 30 0

low) to 10 T-Test - Independent Samples Test - April 5, 2016 Independent Sample Test Loven's story of Verano foros Ago ir 5 000 1996 dr Man 1 -3261 -3.261 wer Number of Units this Semester 1.474 26 15.105 28 24291 603133 -6.93333 33333 235 10 2015 Average Work hours per wook 488 83333 os Test 1.151 2012 117 28 25.10 53333 2.12010 2118 1.70717 1.90717 454100 4540 5102 61302 Average Caregiving per week si ed .000 006 629 630 900 006 957 957 360 865 2471 2017 67611 Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assured Equal variances sumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assured Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assured Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed 012 117 054 012 28 881947 -12.00241 27 135 Stress on a 1 (low) to 10 (high) scale 2.773 107 -330330 33333 13330 13333 054 -177 -177 730 28 75172 -1.57310 25.245 Average hours sleep per Wook 668 421 28 2 25667 1.68078 404 4.09672 730 27.521 411 226667 75172 3.10010 3.10010 56512 56512 Hoaith on a 1 (low) to 10 (high) scule 000 1.000 - 354 28 728 720 -354 20000 - 20000 27.568 -11070 -1.35612

Oneway Oneway - ANOVA - April 5, 2016 ANOVA Age 5 df F Mean Square 87.233 42.052 Sig. .145 2.074 Number of Units this semester 15.058 21.745 .692 509 Average Work hours per week Test 8.356 831.433 99.504 .001 Average Caregiving per week Between Groups Within Groups Total Between Groups Within Groups Total Between Groups Within Groups Total Between Groups Within Groups Total Between Groups Within Groups Total Between Groups Within Groups Total Between Groups Within Groups Total Sum of Squares 174.467 1135.400 1309.867 30.117 587.125 617.242 1662.867 2686.600 4349.467 902.600 7004.900 7907.500 15.000 103.800 118.800 45.267 2015.400 2060.667 5.067 62 300 67.367 451.300 259.441 1.740 2 27 29 2 27 29 2 27 29 2 27 29 2 27 29 2 27 29 2 27 29 .195 Stress on a 1 (low) to 10 (high) scale 7.500 3.844 1.951 .162 Average hours sleep per week 22.633 74.644 .303 .741 Health on a 1 (low) to 10 (high) scale 2.533 2.307 1.098 348

Next Help Crosstabs Crosstabs - Case Processing Summary - April 5, 2016 目 Et Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing N Percent N Percent 30 100.0% 0 0.0% Course Gender Total Percent N 30 100.0%

Crosstabs Crosstabs - Course * Gender Crosstabulation - April 5, 2016 目 * tics Course Gender Crosstabulation Count Samples Test Course Gender Female Male 5 10 Total Intro Psyc Psyc Stats 15 11 Total 4 15 16 14 30 Summary

Log Next Help Crosstabs Crosstabs - Chi-Square Tests - April 5, 2016 T-Test Group Statistics Independent Samples Test Log Sig. df Log 1 Oneway 1 ANOVA Chi-Square Tests Exact Exact Asymptotic Sig. Significance (2- (1- Value (2-sided) sided) sided) Pearson Chi-Square 4.821a .028 Continuity Correction 3.348 .067 Likelihood Ratio 4.963 .026 Fisher's Exact Test .066 .033 Linear-by- Linear 4.661 1 Association .031 N of Valid Cases 30 a. O cells (0,0%) have expected countless than 5. The minimum expected b. Computed only for a 2x2 table 1 Log LOG Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Course Gender Crosstabu TEDET HARI BE Chi-Square Tests

this sem Correlations Correlations - Correlations - April 5, 2016 ours per ing per w w) to 10 Number of Units this semester Average Work hours per week Average Caregiving Stress on a 1 (low) to 10 (high) scale Average hours sleep Health on a 1 (low) to 10 (high) scale eep per Age Age per week per week W) to 10 1 - 260 203 .322 285 .195 -.052 .165 .282 .082 .126 30 .303 30 .784 30 Number of Units this semester 30 30 - 260 30 1 30 - 309 -060 - 242 - 027 165 367 .096 .752 .199 30 .887 30 .046 30 30 30 Average Work hours per week .203 30 30 - 309 A .022 Pearson Correlation Sig. (2 tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2. tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2. tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2- tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2- tailed) N Parsan .358 .000 282 -308 .096 .910 .052 30 .998 .098 30 30 Average Caregiving per week 30 30 322 30 -060 30 .022 1 .212 be Tact - 217 ..180 .082 .752 .910 262 30 250 30 .341 30 30 30 285 30 Stress on a 1 (low) to 10 (high) scale - 242 30 .358 212 1 - 269 .126 -622" .199 .052 262 30 .151 Amerno 30 .000 30 30 30 30 30

Help em er v -UOU .242 erw PUZI .367 .752 .199 110 .887 .046 30 30 30 30 er hours per .022 .358 .000 - 308 10 .910 .052 .998 .098 30 30 30 30 1 .212 - 217 - 180 Next Correlations Correlations - Correlations - April 5, 2016 Units this Correlation ".200 P.309 semester Sig. (2- tailed) .165 .096 N 30 30 30 Average Pearson Work Correlation 203 -309 1 Sig. (2- week tailed) 282 .096 N 30 30 30 Average Pearson Caregiving Correlation .322 -060 .022 per week Sig. (2 tailed) .082 .752 .910 N 30 30 30 Stress on Pearson a 1 (low) Correlation 285 - 242 to 10 (high) Sig. (2- scale tailed) .126 .199 .052 N 30 30 30 Average Pearson hours Correlation .195 -.027 .000 sleep per week Sig. (2 tailed) .303 .887 .998 N 30 30 30 Health on Pearson a 1 (low) Correlation -.052 .367 - 308 to 10 (high) Sig. (2- scale tailed) .046 .098 N 30 30 30 Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). 262 .250 .341 30 30 30 30 .358 .212 1 - 269 -.622" .262 .151 .000 30 30 30 30 - 217 - 269 1 .233 250 .151 .216 st 30 30 30 30 - 180 -622** 233 1 .784 .341 .000 .216 30 30 30 30

Jeb Report - SPSS3_Output.spv 3-act ious Next Help Frequency Table Frequency Table - Health on a 1 (low) to 10 (high) scale - April 5, 2016 Health on a 1 (low) to 10 (high) scale Frequency Percent Valid Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 1 2 4 3.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 Total 6 11 3.3 6.7 13.3 20.0 36.7 13.3 3.3 6.7 13.3 20.0 36.7 13.3 6.7 100.0 3.3 10.0 23.3 43.3 80.0 93.3 100.0 IS semi 4 no 2 30 6.7 s pery 100.0 per w to 10 pper Co 10