(a) Explain why you can't use Trapezoidal or Simpson's rules to approximate / In af() dx. (b) Derive an integral formula

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

(a) Explain why you can't use Trapezoidal or Simpson's rules to approximate / In af() dx. (b) Derive an integral formula

Post by answerhappygod »

A Explain Why You Can T Use Trapezoidal Or Simpson S Rules To Approximate In Af Dx B Derive An Integral Formula 1
A Explain Why You Can T Use Trapezoidal Or Simpson S Rules To Approximate In Af Dx B Derive An Integral Formula 1 (323.48 KiB) Viewed 32 times
(a) Explain why you can't use Trapezoidal or Simpson's rules to approximate / In af() dx. (b) Derive an integral formula of the form 1 ti In x f(x) dx ~af (0) +bf(1/2) + cf(1) +kf(4)(c), = = X3. It will be 1 by making it exact for f(x) = 1, x, x2 and finding k by setting f(2) 1 useful to know that x” In x dx Hint: you should get k (n + 1)2 [ - = -1/288. = = (c) Use this formula (without the f(4) term) to approximate In x cos x dx = -0.94608 30704. What is the error? Remember that in this case f(x) = cos x. (d) Using the midpoint rule with f(x) In x cos x, how big does n need to be to get the same accuracy as the previous formula? Clearly building integration rules that take into account the form of the integrand is clearly a good idea!
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply