Question 3 (05.01, 05.04 MC) Two opposing opinions were shown to a random sample of 1,500 buyers of a particular politic

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

Question 3 (05.01, 05.04 MC) Two opposing opinions were shown to a random sample of 1,500 buyers of a particular politic

Post by answerhappygod »

Question 3 (05.01, 05.04 MC)
Two opposing opinions were shown to a random sample of 1,500 buyers of a particular political news app in the United States. The opinions, shown in a random order to each buyer, were as follows:
Opinion A: Improving the healthcare systen is more important than improving the education system.
Opinion B: Improving the education system is more important than improving the healthcare system.
Buyers were to choose the opinion that most closely reflected their own. If they felt neutral on the topics, they were to choose a third option of "Neutral."
The outcomes were as follows:
39% chose Opinion A, 54% chose Opinion B, and 7% chose "Neutral."
Part A: Create and interpret a 98% confidence interval for the proportion of all US buyers of this particular app who would have chosen Opinion B. (3 points)
Part B: The number of buyers that chose Opinion B and are both greater than 10. Why must this inference condition be met? (3 points)
Part C: Would a two-sample z-interval for a difference between proportiona be an appropriate procedure to find if the difference in proportiona between US buyers who would have chosen Opinion B and US buyers who would have chosen Opinion A is statistically significant? Explain why or why not. (4 points)
Question 3 05 01 05 04 Mc Two Opposing Opinions Were Shown To A Random Sample Of 1 500 Buyers Of A Particular Politic 1
Question 3 05 01 05 04 Mc Two Opposing Opinions Were Shown To A Random Sample Of 1 500 Buyers Of A Particular Politic 1 (60.2 KiB) Viewed 43 times
(05.01, 05.04 MC) Two opposing opinions were shown to a random sample of 1,500 buyers of a particular political news app in the United States. The opinions, shown in a random order to each buyer, were as follows: Opinion A: Improving the healthcare system is more important than improving the education system. Opinion B: Improving the education system is more important than improving the healthcare system. Buyers were to choose the opinion that most closely reflected their own. If they felt neutral on the topics, they were to choose a third option of "Neutral." The outcomes were as follows: 39% chose Opinion A, 54% chose Opinion B, and 7% chose "Neutral." Part A: Create and interpret a 98% confidence interval for the proportion of all US buyers of this particular app who would have chosen Opinion B. (3 points) Part B: The number of buyers that chose Opinion B and the number of buyers that did not choose Opinion B are both greater than 10. Why must this inference condition be met? (3 points) Part C: Would a two-sample z-interval for a difference between proportions be an appropriate procedure to find if the difference in proportions between US buyers who would have chosen Opinion B and US buyers who would have chosen Opinion A is statistically significant? Explain why or why not. (4 points)
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply