This questionnaire was applied to conclude how many times more important each criterion is than the other. poured my sur

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

This questionnaire was applied to conclude how many times more important each criterion is than the other. poured my sur

Post by answerhappygod »

This Questionnaire Was Applied To Conclude How Many Times More Important Each Criterion Is Than The Other Poured My Sur 1
This Questionnaire Was Applied To Conclude How Many Times More Important Each Criterion Is Than The Other Poured My Sur 1 (50.89 KiB) Viewed 42 times
This Questionnaire Was Applied To Conclude How Many Times More Important Each Criterion Is Than The Other Poured My Sur 2
This Questionnaire Was Applied To Conclude How Many Times More Important Each Criterion Is Than The Other Poured My Sur 2 (159.4 KiB) Viewed 42 times
This Questionnaire Was Applied To Conclude How Many Times More Important Each Criterion Is Than The Other Poured My Sur 3
This Questionnaire Was Applied To Conclude How Many Times More Important Each Criterion Is Than The Other Poured My Sur 3 (191.59 KiB) Viewed 42 times
This Questionnaire Was Applied To Conclude How Many Times More Important Each Criterion Is Than The Other Poured My Sur 4
This Questionnaire Was Applied To Conclude How Many Times More Important Each Criterion Is Than The Other Poured My Sur 4 (129 KiB) Viewed 42 times
I need mathematical model topsis method in my datas
This questionnaire was applied to conclude how many times more important each criterion is than the other. poured my survey data into excel. Anket 1 Kalite-fiyat kalite-mesa kalite-prpje kalite-ödeme fiyat-mesafe fiyat-proje fiyat-ödeme mesafe-proje mesafe-ödeme proje-ödeme Anket 2 Anket 3 Anket 4 Anket 5 Anket 6 Anket 7 Anket 8 Anket 9 8 5 0,5 3,00 5 1 0,33 5 5 3 3 3,00 3 3 5 5 1/9 1/3 2 0,11 4 1/5 1/5 1/9 5 8 9 3,00 4 6 7 7 7 4 3 3,00 1 5 7 8 1/5 1/7 1/8 0,14 1/5 3 4 2. 1 4 1 3 4 1 3 1/9 1/9 1/9 0,11 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/7 1/5 0,17 1/7 1/5 1/3 1/3 6 4 5 8,00 2 9 7 8 Anket 10 0,33 7 7,00 5 0,33 1/7 7,00 7 7,00 7 1,00 1/3 1,00 1 0,11 1/9 0,50 1/8 7,00 9 9,00 。

I calculated the critical weights to apply the Topsis method. I first took the geometric mean of each question to calculate the critical weights. Kalite-fiyat kalite-mesa kalite-prpje kalite-ödeme fiyat-mesafe fiyat-proje fiyat-ödeme mesafe-proje mesafe-ödeme proje-ödeme Anketlerin Geometrik ortalaması 1. soru 2. soru 3.soru 4.soru 5.soru 6.soru 7.soru 8.soru 9.soru 10.soru 2,0200 4,0100 0,3003 6,0120 4,5000 0,4998 2,0400 0,1097 0,2000 6,0000 A pairwise comparison table was created. Then the column totals were found. Kalite Fiyat Mesafe Proje Ödeme Toplam Kalite Fiyat Mesafe Proje Ödeme 1 2,02 4,01 0,3003 6,012 0,49505 1 4,50 0,4998 2,04 0,249377 0,222222 1,00 0,1097 0,2 3,330003 2,0008 9,12 1 6 0,166334 0,490196 5,00 0,166667 1 5,240763 5,733219 23,62577 2,076467 15,252 Afterwards, the values were divided by the sum in their own column and a new table was obtained.Row totals were found and I divided each row total by our criteria count to find the criteria weights. To test the accuracy of these values, I checked in the superdesicions application. I saw that my inconsistency rate was less than 0.10 and there would be no problem in applying the Topsis method. Kalite Fiyat Mesafe Proje Ödeme Kalite Fiyat Mesafe Proje Ödeme Toplam Ağırlık Superdecisions 0,190812 0,352333 0,17 0,144621 0,394178 1,251673 0,250335 0,26 0,094461 0,174422 0,19 0,240697 0,133753 0,833804 0,166761 0,16 0,047584 0,03876 0,04 0,05283 0,013113 0,194614 0,038923 0,04 0,635404 0,348984 0,39 0,481587 0,393391 2,245207 0,449041 0,46 0,031739 0,085501 0,21 0,080265 0,065565 0,474703 0,094941 0,09

Relevant supplier options were scored with relevant criteria. W ASAP Çelik RONA Çelik İMKON İmalat Montaj PROMOTECH Çelik Profil AZİM Paslanmaz Çelik Kalite Fiyat(Maliyet) Mesafe(Maliyet)(m) Yetiştirilebilirlik Ödeme Kolaylığı 0,250335 0,166761 0,038923 0,449041 0,094941 5 71 1360 9) 6 4 72 2901 2 6 1 74 2944 4 9 9 71 1261) 5 9 71 695 3 performance matrix Kalite W ASAP Çelik RONA Çelik İMKON imalat Montaj PROMOTECH Çelik Profil AZİM Paslanmaz Çelik Fiyat(Maliyet) Mesafe(Maliyet)(m) Yetiştirilebilirlik Ödeme Kolaylığı 0,250335 0,166761 0,038923 0,449041 0,094941 25 5041 1849600 81 36 16 5184 8415801 4 361 1 5476 8667136 16 81 81 5041 1590121 25 9 81 5041 483025 9 4 performance matrix squared Kalite Fiyat(Maliyet) Mesafe(Maliyet)(m) Yetiştirilebilirlik Ödeme Kolaylığı 0,250335 0,166761 0,038923 0,449041 0,094941 25 5041 1849600 81 36 16 5184 8415801 4 36 1 5476 8667136 16 81 81 5041 1590121 25 9 81 5041 483025 9 4 204 25783 21005683 135 166 14,2828569 160,5708566 4583,195719 11,61895004 12,88409873 W ASAP Çelik RONA Çelik İMKON imalat Montaj PROMOTECH Çelik Profil AZIM Paslanmaz Çelik TOPLAM Kare Toplam karekök sum of squares and square root of the sum W ASAP Çelik RONA Çelik İMKON İmalat Montaj PROMOTECH Çelik Profil AZIM Paslanmaz Çelik Kalite Fiyat/Maliyet) Mesafe(Maliyet)(m) Yetiştirilebilirlik Ödeme Kolaylığı 0,250335 0,166761 0,038923 0,449041 0,094941 0,35007002 0,442172393 0,296736182 0,774596669 0,465690315 0,28005602 0,448400174 0,632964459 0,172132593 0,465690315 0,070014 0,460855734 0,642346559 0,344265186 0,698535473 0,63012604 0,442172393 0,275135534 0,430331483 0,232845158 0,63012604 0,442172393 0,151640917 0,25819889 0,155230105 The values in the first table were divided by the total ideal Çözüm Anti-ideal Çözüm 0,63012604 0,070014 0,442172393 0,460855734 0,151640917 0,774596669 0,642346559 0,172132593 0,698535473 0,155230105 NORMALIZED WEIGHTED MATRIX(values in first table divided by total square root). Ideal and anti- ideal values were found by calculating maximums and minimums. Then the positive ideal deviation and anti-ideal deviation will be calculated.

Pozitif idealden Sapma W ASAP Çelik RONA Çelik IMKON imalat Montaj PROMOTECH Çelik Profil AZİM Paslanmaz Çelik Kalite Fiyat|Maliyet) Mesafe(Maliyet)(m) Yetiştirilebilirlik Ödeme Kolaylığı SI Pozitif 0,250335 0,166761 0,038923 0,449041 0,094941 TOPLAM KARE Toplam karekök 0,07843137 이 0,021052636 01 0,054216867 0,153700876 0,392047033 0,12254902 3,87852E-05 0,231672353 0,362962963/ 0,054216867 0,771439988 0,878316565 0,31372549 0,000349067 0,240792028 0,185185185 0 0,74005177 0,860262617 0 이 0,01525092 0,118518519 0,21686747 0,350636909 0,59214602 Ol 0 0 0,266666667 0,295180723 0,56184739 0,7495648 deviation from the positive ideal Anti Idealden Sapma Kalite Fiyat(Maliyet) Mesafe(Maliyet)(m) Yetiştirilebilirlik Ödeme Kolaylığı Si Negatif W 0,250335 0,166761 0,038923 0,449041 0,094941 Toplam Kare Toplam karekök ASAP Çelik 0,07843137 0,000349067 0,119446533 0,362962963 0,096385542 0,657575478 0,810910277 RONA Çelik 0,04411765 0,000155141 8,80238E-05 0 0,096385542 0,140746354 0,37516177 IMKON imalat Montaj 0 0 0 0,02962963 0,295180723 0,324810353 0,569921356 PROMOTECH Çelik Profil 0,31372549 0,000349067 0,134843937 0,066666667 0,006024096 0,521609258 0,722225213 AZİM Paslanmaz Çelik 0,31372549 0,000349067 0,240792028 0,007407407 0 0,562273992 0,749849313 deviation from the anti-ideal After the closeness of alternative i to the ideal solution is denoted by Ci*, and It is calculated using the formula below. Cr= S:- S,+S. . (i = 1,...,m) Alternatif Ci ASAP Çelik 0,674097302 PROMOTECH Çelik Profil 0,54948343 AZİM Paslanmaz Çelik 0,500094875 İMKON İmalat Montaj 0,398495136 RONA Çelik 0,299296573
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply