When solving Linear Programs, it is tempting to solve for the intercept of each constraint and then iterate all of the C

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

When solving Linear Programs, it is tempting to solve for the intercept of each constraint and then iterate all of the C

Post by answerhappygod »

When Solving Linear Programs It Is Tempting To Solve For The Intercept Of Each Constraint And Then Iterate All Of The C 1
When Solving Linear Programs It Is Tempting To Solve For The Intercept Of Each Constraint And Then Iterate All Of The C 1 (20.3 KiB) Viewed 23 times
When solving Linear Programs, it is tempting to solve for the intercept of each constraint and then iterate all of the Corner Point Feasible solutions and choose the best one. Why is that discouraged for practical applications? a. Because we may have infinite solutions along a boundary that iterating couldn't possibly uncover b. Because while for small, 2-dimensional problems with very few constraints it seems more efficient than the graphical method or the simplex method, for anything above 3- dimensions (aka 3 variables) the Simplex method is more efficient by 10 times c. All of these d. Because real-life problems are much larger, and the computational energy needed to iterate through each solution becomes unwieldy at size
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply