Question three 126 Marks! The following are for independent scenarios, which might require separate responses. Each may

[answerhappygod]

Question Three 126 Marks The Following Are For Independent Scenarios Which Might Require Separate Responses Each May 1 (55.3 KiB) Viewed 35 times

Question three 126 Marks! The following are for independent scenarios, which might require separate responses. Each may require a justification for the appropriate responses made in each of the situations. (1) Jamintel Limited has been sued for the disposal effluent in the nearby river. The matter if currently before the St. James Parish Court. However, as at December 31. 2021, management is not sure as whether the entity will win or lose the current court case. There are also not certain of what obligations the entity will face should it lose the matter in court (ii) Septon Limited currently has a matter in the Supreme Court for wrongful dismissal of is prior chief executive office. The entity was apprised by its attorney in December 2021 that they is a strong possibility that the entity will lose the case and may face damages of about $225 million. (iii) Wellington Limited is currently conducting and audit of the year ended December 31, 2021. On January 20, 2022, the CFO discovered a massive fraud, which involves lapping of accounts receivables. On further investigation, it was ascertained that the accounting manager pocketed S100 million, which was paid by customers, but which were not applied to the customers' accounts in the subsidiary ledgers. Required: a For each of the situations above, kindly indicate the appropriate treatment in the financial statements 16 marks b. Prepare the relevant journal entries or entry where adjustments are required to entity's financial statement based on the scenarios above. 19 marks c. Distinguish between ordinary negligence and fraud. 15 marks d. State any three audit procedures relevant to the test of contingent liabilities. 1 6 marks