Next step was to run some ARIMA models and compare them. This led to the following ARIMA runs: Model 1 Model 1: ARMA, us

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

Next step was to run some ARIMA models and compare them. This led to the following ARIMA runs: Model 1 Model 1: ARMA, us

Post by answerhappygod »

Next Step Was To Run Some Arima Models And Compare Them This Led To The Following Arima Runs Model 1 Model 1 Arma Us 1
Next Step Was To Run Some Arima Models And Compare Them This Led To The Following Arima Runs Model 1 Model 1 Arma Us 1 (67.47 KiB) Viewed 36 times
Next step was to run some ARIMA models and compare them. This led to the following ARIMA runs: Model 1 Model 1: ARMA, using observations 1948:02-2020:03 (T= 866) Dependent variable: d UNRATE Standard errors based on Hessian Coefficient Std. Error Z p-value 0.8460 const phi_1 0.00287270 0.0147910 0.1942 0.870665 0.0296668 29.35 -0.718031 0.0379465 -18.92 <0.0001 <0.0001 theta 1 Mean dependent var S.D. dependent var 0.001155 -0.000378 0.086522 162.6270 -298.1985 Mean of innovations R-squared Log-likelihood Schwarz criterion S.D. of innovations Adjusted R-squared Akaike criterion Hannan-Quinn Real Imaginary Modulus Frequency AR Root 1 1.1485 0.0000 1.1485 0.0000 ΜΑ Root 1 1.3927 0.0000 1.3927 0.0000 Test for autocorrelation up to order 12 Ljung-Box Q' = 75.3636, with p-value = P(Chi-square (10) > 75.3636) = 4.042e-012 *** 0.209924 0.200521 0.085465 -317.2540 -309.9612 Model 2 Model 2: ARMA, using observations 1948:02-2020:03 (T=866) Dependent variable: d UNRATE Standard errors based on Hessian Coefficient Std. Error z 0.00298555 0.0148977 0.555245 0.0625183 0.238727 0.0373804 -0.538385 0.0583563 p-value 0.8412 const phi_1 <0.0001 0.2004 8.881 6.386 -9.226 phi_2 <0.0001 <0.0001 theta_1 Mean dependent var Mean of innovations R-squared Log-likelihood Schwarz criterion 0.001155 S.D. dependent var -0.000420 S.D. of innovations 0.123133 Adjusted R-squared 180.2785 Akaike criterion -326.7375 Hannan-Quinn Imaginary Modulus AR Real 1.1911 -3.5169 0.0000 Root 1 Root 2 0.0000 ΜΑ Root 1 1.8574 0.0000 Test for autocorrelation up to order 12 Liung-Box Q' = 36.8101, with p-value = P(Chi-square (9) > 36.8101) = 2.845e-005 1.1911 3.5169 1.8574 *** 0.209924 0.196462 0.121101 -350.5570 -341.4410 Frequency 0.0000 0.5000 0.0000
Model 3 Model 3: ARMA, using observations 1948:02-2020:03 (T = 866) p-value 0.8228 const Dependent variable: d UNRATE Standard errors based on Hessian Coefficient Std. Error 0.00257941 0.0115202 1.65561 0.0374836 -0.782771 0.0433592 -1.64177 0.0383751 0.863215 0.0479172 phi_1 phi_2 theta_1 theta_2 Z 0.2239 44.17 -18.05 -42.78 18.01 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 Mean dependent var S.D. dependent var S.D. of innovations Mean of innovations R-squared Log-likelihood 0.001155 -0.000443 0.137289 187.0535 -333.5236 Adjusted R-squared Schwarz criterion Akaike criterion Hannan-Quinn Real Imaginary Modulus Frequency AR Root 1 1.0575 -0.3989 1.1303 -0.0574 Root 2 1.0575 0.3989 1.1303 0.0574 ΜΑ 0.9510 -0.5041 1.0763 -0.0776 Root 1 Root 2 0.9510 0.5041 1.0763 0.0776 Test for autocorrelation up to order 12 Ljung-Box Q' = 39.2977, with p-value = P(Chi-square(8) > 39.2977) = 4.328e-006 *** *** *** 0.209924 0.194870 0.134286 -362.1069 -351.1678 Model 4 Model 15: ARMA, using observations 1948:02-2020:03 (T=866) Z const phi_1 Dependent variable: d UNRATE Standard errors based on Hessian Coefficient Std. Error 0.00250730 0.0113898 0.2201 0.578072 0.0624914 9.250 0.117027 0.0739480 1.583 0.611279 0.108845 5.616 -0.695650 0.0557809 -12.47 phi 2 phi 3 phi 4 p-value 0.8258 <0.0001 0.1135 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.3932 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.6673 theta_1 -0.585967 -8.732 0.0671052 0.0631790 0.0740003 theta_2 theta_3 0.8538 -0.595233 0.107839 -5.520 0.766918 0.0693611 11.06 0.0305044 0.0709625 0.4299 theta_4 theta_5 Mean dependent var Mean of innovations R-squared Log-likelihood Schwarz criterion 0.001155 -0.000422 0.160680 198.7941 -323.1854 S.D. dependent var S.D. of innovations Adjusted R-squared Akaike criterion Hannan-Quinn Real Imaginary Modulus Frequency AR Root 1 1.0508 0.4052 1.1262 0.0586 Root 2 1.0508 -0.4052 1.1262 -0.0586 Root 3 -0.6114 -0.8715 1.0646 -0.3474 0.3474 Root 4 -0.6114 0.8715 1.0646 Root 1 0.9450 0.5028 1.0704 0.0778 Root 2 0.9450 -0.5028 1.0704 -0.0778 Root 3 -0.5661 -0.8856 1.0511 -0.3405 Root 4 -0.5661 0.8856 1.0511 0.3405 Root 5 -25.8989 0.0000 25.8989 0.5000 LM test for autocorrelation up to order 12 - Null hypothesis: no autocorrelation Test statistic: Chi-square(3) = 17.9674 Test for autocorrelation up to order 12 Ljung-Box Q¹ = 17.9674, with p-value = P(Chi-square(3) > 17.9674) = 0.0004467 MA *** *** *** *** *** 0.209924 0.192210 0.152845 -375.5881 -355.5330
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply