The following table from a 2001 JAMA paper by Pradhan and colleagues (JAMA 2001; 286:327-334) summarizes findings from a

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

The following table from a 2001 JAMA paper by Pradhan and colleagues (JAMA 2001; 286:327-334) summarizes findings from a

Post by answerhappygod »

The following table from a 2001 JAMA paper by Pradhan and
colleagues (JAMA 2001; 286:327-334) summarizes findings from a
nested case-control study. The purpose of this study was to
determine if elevated levels of inflammatory markers interleukin 6
(IL6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are associated with the
development of Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in healthy
middle-aged women.
The Following Table From A 2001 Jama Paper By Pradhan And Colleagues Jama 2001 286 327 334 Summarizes Findings From A 1
The Following Table From A 2001 Jama Paper By Pradhan And Colleagues Jama 2001 286 327 334 Summarizes Findings From A 1 (198.04 KiB) Viewed 16 times
Table 2. Crude and Adjusted Relative Risks of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, According to Baseline Plasma Concentration of Interleukin 6 and C-Reactive Protein* Quartile of Interleukin 6, Median (Interquartile Range), pg/mL Quartile of C-Reactive Protein, Median (Interquartile Range), mg/dL 1 3 4 1 2 0.698 1.133 1.646 2.709 (<0.909) (0.91-1.382) (1.383-2.050) (>2.050) 2 3 P for 0.050 0.170 0.435 0.930 Trend (<0.10) (0.10-0.26) (0.27-0.61) (>0.61) P for Trend Crude analysis 1.0 2.5 (1.1-5.6) 4.1 (2.0-8.4) 7.5 (3.7-15.4) <.001 1.0 .02 2.2 (0.8-6.0) 8.7 (3.6-21.0) 15.7 (6.5-37.9) <.001 .13 <.001 <.001 <.001 <.001 Relative risk (95% CI) 1.0 .008 1.0 1.8 (0.7-4.4) 1.9 (0.8-4.2) 2.9 (1.3-6.7) .19 1.2 (0.4-3.5) 4.1 (1.6-10.6) 4.4 (1.7-11.5) <.001 .73 .002 P value .12 .01 .004 Adjusted for all risk factorst Relative risk (95% Cl) 1.0 .07 1.0 1.4 (0.6-3.7) 1.3 (0.6-3.1) 2.3 (0.9-5.6) .47 51 1.3 (0.4-4.1) 4.1 (1.5-11.5) 4.2 (1.5-12.0) .001 .61 .007 .007 .08 P value *Limited to subjects with hemoglobin A₁ of 6.5% or less: 188 cases, 362 controls. Cl indicates confidence interval; BMI, body mass index. †Matched on age and fasting status, controlled for BMI, family history of diabetes, smoking, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and hormone replacement therapy. Relative risk (95% CI) P value BMI-adjusted analysis
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply