Indicator Option1 Option2 Unit Abiotic depletion 3.73367e-5 3.77122e-5 kg Sb eq Abiotic depletion (fossil fuels) 2.06039

[answerhappygod]

Indicator Option1 Option2 Unit Abiotic Depletion 3 73367e 5 3 77122e 5 Kg Sb Eq Abiotic Depletion Fossil Fuels 2 06039 1 (214.71 KiB) Viewed 26 times

We found that the GWP100a and ODP value was lowered when using
wood, which is a good thing. The chemical reaction of burning both
natural gas and wood, is the combination of Methane
(CH4) and Oxygen (O2), generating
CO2 and H2O (plus heat).

My question is why it is better to use wood as a heat source, over
natural gas?
Indicator Option1 Option2 Unit Abiotic depletion 3.73367e-5 3.77122e-5 kg Sb eq Abiotic depletion (fossil fuels) 2.06039e+2 1.82039e+2 MJ Acidification 1.14330e-1 1.16518e-1 kg SO2 eq Eutrophication 5.90429e-2 6.01084e-2 kg PO4--- eq Fresh water aquatic ecotox. 4.43230e+1 4.43824e+1 kg 1,4-DB eq Global warming (GWP100a) 2.98215e+1 2.84118e+1 kg CO2 eq Human toxicity 9.48639e+O 9.62637e+O kg 1,4-DB eq Marine aquatic ecotoxicity 3.36904e+4 3.37312e+4 kg 1,4-DB eq Ozone layer depletion (ODP) 3.83463e-5 3.81648e-5 kg CFC-11 eq Photochemical oxidation 4.25770e-3 4.98965e-3 kg C2H4 eq Terrestrial ecotoxicity 2.69246e+0 2.69509e+O kg 1,4-DB eq