An MPLS network infrastructure of the service provider ABC is growing very quickly due to many recent acquisitions. Conc

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

An MPLS network infrastructure of the service provider ABC is growing very quickly due to many recent acquisitions. Conc

Post by answerhappygod »

An MPLS network infrastructure of the service provider ABC is growing very quickly due to many recent acquisitions. Concerns arise about labeling each and every IP address on the service provider core network. The IP address pace is designed as per following:
✑ Service provide ip address range is: 10.0.0.0/16
✑ All loopbacks addresses use subnet mask /32
✑ 10.0.0.0/24 range is used for loopback addresses
✑ All other subnet masks used for links are /24 and /25
Which configuration does significantly reduce the label allocations without compromising LDP functionalities?

A. ip prefix-list List1 deny 10.0.0.0/16le 20 ge 25!mpls ldp label allocate global prefix-list List1
B. access-list 1 permit 10.0.0.0.0.0.255.255mpls ldp neighbor 10.0.0.1 labels accept 3
C. mpls ldp password required for 10!access-list 10 permit 10.0.0.1access-list 10 permit 10.0.0.2access-list 10 permit 10.0.0.3
D. mpls ldp label allocate global host-routes
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!

This topic has 1 reply

You must be a registered member and logged in to view the replies in this topic.


Register Login
 
Post Reply