Which two design considerations are required to add the Cisco Email Security Appliance to an existing mail delivery chai

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

Which two design considerations are required to add the Cisco Email Security Appliance to an existing mail delivery chai

Post by answerhappygod »

Which two design considerations are required to add the Cisco Email Security Appliance to an existing mail delivery chain? (Choose two.)

A. Existing MX records should be maintained and policy routing should be used to redirect traffic to the ESA.
B. Update the MX records to point to the inbound listener interfaces on the ESA.
C. Update the MX records to point to the outbound listener interfaces on the ESA.
D. Different Listeners must be used to handle inbound and outbound mail handling.
E. The ESA should be connected to the same subnet as the Email Server because it maintains only a single routing table.
F. The ESA can be connected to a DMZ external to the Email Server because it maintains multiple routing tables.
G. The ESA can be connected to a DMZ external to the Email Server but it maintains only a single routing table.
H. Mail Listeners by default can share the same IP interface by defining the routes for sending and receiving.
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!

This topic has 1 reply

You must be a registered member and logged in to view the replies in this topic.


Register Login
 
Post Reply