Which of the following statements is NOT a valid reason to use MP-BGP as a routing protocol to transport VPRN routes?

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

Which of the following statements is NOT a valid reason to use MP-BGP as a routing protocol to transport VPRN routes?

Post by answerhappygod »

Which of the following statements is NOT a valid reason to use MP-BGP as a routing protocol to transport VPRN routes?

A. The number of VPRN routes can become very large. MP-BGP can support a very large number of routes.
B. MP-BGP can carry routing information for a number of different address families.
C. MP-BGP is designed to exchange information between routers that are not directly connected. This feature keeps VPRN routing information out of P-routers.
D. MP-BGP can carry additional information attached to a route as an optional BGP attribute.
E. All of the above statements are valid reasons for using MP-BGP as a VPRN routing protocol.
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!

This topic has 1 reply

You must be a registered member and logged in to view the replies in this topic.


Register Login
 
Post Reply