8.37 Consider the cumulative logit model, logit[P(Y < ;)] = a; + Bjx, not having pro- portional odds form. a. With conti

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

8.37 Consider the cumulative logit model, logit[P(Y < ;)] = a; + Bjx, not having pro- portional odds form. a. With conti

Post by answerhappygod »

8 37 Consider The Cumulative Logit Model Logit P Y A Bjx Not Having Pro Portional Odds Form A With Conti 1
8 37 Consider The Cumulative Logit Model Logit P Y A Bjx Not Having Pro Portional Odds Form A With Conti 1 (59.63 KiB) Viewed 40 times
8.37 Consider the cumulative logit model, logit[P(Y < ;)] = a; + Bjx, not having pro- portional odds form. a. With continuous x taking values over the real line, show that the model is improper in that cumulative probabilities are misordered for a range of x values. b. When x is a binary indicator, explain why the model is proper but requires constraints on (a; +B;) (as well as the usual ordering constraint on {a;}) and is then equivalent to the saturated model.
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply