pls solve correctly and urgent

[answerhappygod]

pls solve correctly and urgent

Pls Solve Correctly And Urgent 1 (62.36 KiB) Viewed 44 times

Olivia felt unwell after attending a birthday party. Olivia thought that perhaps the prawns she had eaten were not fresh. Olivia visited her doctor who confirmed she ha salmonella infection. Olivia thought she would try to determine if there was indeed a link between salmonella infection and prawns. Olivia contacted the other party-g contracted a salmonella infection, and whether or not they had eaten the prawns. The results are displayed below: Prawns Eaten? Yes No Total SPSS Output: Prawns Eaten? * Salmonella Infection? Count Prawns Eaten? No Yes Total Salmonella Infection? Yes 12 5 17 N Case Processing Summary Valid 50 No 7 26 33 Prawns Eaten?* Salmonella Infection? Crosstabulation 26 7 33 Percent 100.0% Salmonella Infection? No Yes 5 12 17 Total N 19 31 50 Total Cases Missing 0 31 19 50 Percent 0.0% N Total 50 Percent 100.0%
Using the information provided what is the relative risk of salmonella infection for party-goes who had eaten prawns? 3.92 Using the information provided what is the odds ratio of salmonella infection for party-goes who had not eaten prawns? 0.11 The relative risk of salmonella infection for party-goes who had not eaten prawns is 0.26. What is the best interpretation of this relative risk ratio value. a), b), c), or d)? a) The risk of salmonella infection for party-goes who had not eaten prawns is 0.26 times lower than for party-goes who had eaten prawns. b) The risk of salmonella infection for party-goes who had not eaten prawns is 0.26 times higher than for party-goes who had eaten prawns. c) The risk of salmonella infection for party-goes who had not eaten prawns is 0.26 times as likely as for party-goes who had eaten prawns - it is less likely. d) The risk of salmonella infection for party-goes who had not eaten prawns is 0.26 times as likely as for party-goes who had eaten prawns - it is more likely. C