Where did they get 4 from (next to the integral)? and why aren't the parameters -3 to 3? ANSWER:

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

Where did they get 4 from (next to the integral)? and why aren't the parameters -3 to 3? ANSWER:

Post by answerhappygod »

Where did they get 4 from (next to the integral)? and why aren't the parameters -3 to 3?
Where Did They Get 4 From Next To The Integral And Why Aren T The Parameters 3 To 3 Answer 1
Where Did They Get 4 From Next To The Integral And Why Aren T The Parameters 3 To 3 Answer 1 (57.57 KiB) Viewed 42 times
ANSWER:
Where Did They Get 4 From Next To The Integral And Why Aren T The Parameters 3 To 3 Answer 2
Where Did They Get 4 From Next To The Integral And Why Aren T The Parameters 3 To 3 Answer 2 (80.3 KiB) Viewed 42 times
In exercises 41–44, find parametric equations for the indicated curve. If you have access to a graphing utility, graph the surfaces and the resulting curve. Estimate its arc length. 44. The intersection of y² + z² = 9 and x = = 2

44. Solve for z in terms of y and use y as a parameter to get x = 2, y = t, and z=+√9-t² S 3 45 0² +1² + 13 -t 19-1² -12 (sin()X- 3 2 dt = 18.8496
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply