This is all the information offered on the question. I cannot elaborate more as this is the complete questions set. 4. I

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

This is all the information offered on the question. I cannot elaborate more as this is the complete questions set. 4. I

Post by answerhappygod »

This is all the information offered on the question. I
cannot elaborate more as this is the complete questions
set.
4. In class we talked about how the Arrow-Pratt coefficient of
absolute risk aversion can be thought of as proportional to the
insurance premium that an expected utility maximizer would be
willing to pay to completely avoid a small, mean zero risk.
Mathematically, we could write this insight the following way:
This Is All The Information Offered On The Question I Cannot Elaborate More As This Is The Complete Questions Set 4 I 1
This Is All The Information Offered On The Question I Cannot Elaborate More As This Is The Complete Questions Set 4 I 1 (73.14 KiB) Viewed 24 times
E[u(w + ē)] = u(w – T) where u is the agent's Bernoulli utility function, w is their wealth level, 7 is the insurance premium/willingness to pay to avoid ē, and ē is mean-zero risk (i.e. ē is a random variable with Ele) = 0). Prove that for small ē, r(w) -u"(W)/U'(w) is proportional to 7. What is the constant of proportionality for this relationship? [Hint: start by taking the second- order Taylor expansion of the equation above).
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply