- Pement 17 Babies Were Asked To Watch A Climber Atempt To Ascend A Hill On Te Sccasions The Baby Wsses Bedner Tal To Ma 1 (34.82 KiB) Viewed 21 times
pement, 17 babies were asked to watch a climber atempt to ascend a hill On te sccasions, the baby wsses Bedner tal to ma
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 899603
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am
pement, 17 babies were asked to watch a climber atempt to ascend a hill On te sccasions, the baby wsses Bedner tal to ma
question pop h
pement, 17 babies were asked to watch a climber atempt to ascend a hill On te sccasions, the baby wsses Bedner tal to make the dints Then, the baby whis ht, or a hinderer toy preventing the climber from making the ascend The loys were shown to each baby in a random fashion A second part of this sport hod the cach action, and then the clamber approached the hinderer toy, which is a surprising action The amount of time the baby watched each event was recorded The mean din spat toy verum watching the climber approach the helper toy was 1.25 seconds with a standard deviation of 1 76 seconds Completo parts (a) (b Click the ken to view the table of critical values 12 of 15 State the conclusion for this hypothesis test OA. Do not reject H, There is sufficient evidence at the a-0.01 level of significance to conclude that the difference is greater than 0 OB. Reject H, There is sufficient evidence of the a 0.01 level of significance to conclude that the difference is greater than 0 OC. Do not reject H, There is not sufficient evidence at the a-0.01 level of significance to conclude that the difference is greater than 0 OD. Reject H, There is not sufficient evidence at the a-001 level of significance to conclude that the difference is greater than 0 (c) What do you think the results of this experiment imply about babies' ability to assess surprising behavior? 8 OA. There is sufficient evidence that babies may have the ability to assess surprising behavior Further experimentation should be performed OB. This experiment does not imply anything about babies' ability to assess surprising behavior because comelation does not imply causation OC. There is not sufficient evidence that babies have the ability to assess surprising behavior OD. There is sufficient evidence that babies have the ability to assess surprising behavior This test to poetspo This