Correlation Analysis - Inferential Not at risk children 12. What is the p-value of this correlation? p = 13. Is this a s

[answerhappygod]

Correlation Analysis Inferential Not At Risk Children 12 What Is The P Value Of This Correlation P 13 Is This A S 1 (92.67 KiB) Viewed 13 times

Correlation Analysis Inferential Not At Risk Children 12 What Is The P Value Of This Correlation P 13 Is This A S 2 (41.11 KiB) Viewed 13 times

Correlation Analysis Inferential Not At Risk Children 12 What Is The P Value Of This Correlation P 13 Is This A S 3 (56.07 KiB) Viewed 13 times

Correlation Analysis Inferential Not At Risk Children 12 What Is The P Value Of This Correlation P 13 Is This A S 4 (63.23 KiB) Viewed 13 times

Correlation Analysis Inferential Not At Risk Children 12 What Is The P Value Of This Correlation P 13 Is This A S 5 (60.86 KiB) Viewed 13 times

Correlation Analysis Inferential Not At Risk Children 12 What Is The P Value Of This Correlation P 13 Is This A S 6 (43.69 KiB) Viewed 13 times

Correlation Analysis - Inferential Not at risk children 12. What is the p-value of this correlation? p = 13. Is this a significant correlation? Yes 14. What is the correlation coefficient?r= 15. Is this correlation positive or negative? 16. Is this a weak or strong correlation? At risk children 17. What is the p-value of this correlation? p = 18. Is this a significant correlation? Yes 19. What is the correlation coefficient?r=_ 20. Is this correlation positive or negative? 21. Is this a weak or strong correlation? Not at risk children 1. What is the p-value of this regression? p 2. Is the regression significant? 3. Publication format: F ( Regression Analysis - Inferential Yes No p= )= F 4. Did the parent ratings reliably predict the teacher ratings? 5. How much of the variance of teacher ratings was explained by the parent rating (interpretation of r2): 6. Regression equation? Y-hat= X+ 7. Interpretation of regression equation: When No . ratings increase/decrease by No Yes 13. Regression equation? Y-hat= X+ 14. Interpretation of regression equation: When unit, No unit, At risk children 8. What is the p-value of this regression? p 9. Is the regression significant? 10. Publication format: F ( )= 11. Did the parent ratings reliably predict the teacher ratings? 12. How much of the variance of teacher ratings was explained by the parent rating (interpretation of r²): p= r² = ratings increase/decrease by (y-hat= bx + a) ratings increase by 1 units. r² = (y-hat= bx + a) ratings increase by 1 units.
Play Interaction-Teacher Rating 40.00 30.00 20.00 10,00 8 00 Scatter Plot of Play Interaction - Teacher Rating by Play Interaction - Parent Rating Group?: Not at Risk 8 00 5.00 0 y=10.01+0.315x ● 20.00 10.00 15.00 Play Interaction - Parent Rating ●coomoooo oooooo 8. 00 000 ● 00 ● .60000. dooo 0 000 00 25.00 00000000 00 ... 30.00 R2 Linear-0.085
Play Interaction-Teacher Rating 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 8 At Risk 00 Correlations Group? Not at Risk Scatter Plot of Play Interaction - Teacher Rating by Play Interaction - Parent Rating Group?: At Risk 00 5.00 Descriptive Statistics Play Interaction-Teacher 15.9119 Rating Play Interaction-Parent 18.8609 Rating Play Interaction-Teacher Rating Play Interaction-Parent Rating Mean Std Deviation 5.38379 12.9321 10.00 16.6815 y=10.16+0.17% 15.00 20.00 Play Interaction - Parent Rating 5.03040 5.04925 5.18694 N 305 0 0 305 61 61 O 0 25.00 30.00 R2 Linear-0.021
sk d Group? Not at Riski At Risk Regression At Risk Play Interaction-Teacher Rating Play Interaction-Parent Rating Play Interaction-Teacher Rating Play Interaction-Parent Rating Group? Not at Risk 1 Group? Not at Risk 1 At Risk Pearson Correlation Sig (2-tailed) N **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). 1 Model Variables Entered/Removed Model Variables Entered Play Interaction- Parent Rating Play Interaction- Parent Rating Correlations Pearson Correlation Sig (2-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig (2-tailed) N R Pearson Correlation Sig (2-tailed) N a. Dependent Variable: Play Interaction-Teacher Rating b. All requested variables entered. 292 171ª Variables Removed Model Summary R Square 085 029 Method Enter Enter Adjusted R Square 082 013 Play Interaction- Teacher Rating 305 1 292 <.001 305 1 61 171 188 61 Std. Error of the Estimate 5.15720 5.01713 Play Interaction- Parent Rating 292 <.001 305 1 305 171 188 61 1 61
Group? Not at Risk: Group? Not at Risk R Square 085 At Risk 171 1029 a. Predictors: (Constant), Play Interaction-Parent Rating At Risk Model 1 1 Group? Not at Risk At Risk Model 1 R Model Summary Model 1 292 Regression. Residual Total Regression Residual Total a. Dependent Variable: Play Interaction-Teacher Rating b. Predictors: (Constant), Play Interaction-Parent Rating Adjusted R Square Sum of Squares ANOVA 752.675 8058.817 8811.492 44.577 (Constant) Play Interaction-Parent Rating (Constant) 1485.121 1529.698 082 013 df 1 303 304 1 59 60 Coefficients Play Interaction-Parent Rating a. Dependent Variable: Play Interaction - Teacher Rating 10.012 313 Std. Error of the Estimate 10.160 166 5.15720 5.01713 Unstandardized Coeficients B Std. Error Mean Square 752.675 26.597 44.577 25.172 1.148 059 2.180 125 F 28.300 1.771 Standardized Coefficients Beta 292 171 Sig. <.001 188 8.724 5.320 4.661 1.331 Sig. <.001 <.001 <.001 188
Not at risk children. Scatterplot-Descriptive Analysis 6. Do you see a linear relationship in the scatterplot? Yes, 7. Is this relationship weak or strong? 8. In which direction is the relationship? At risk children positive (as parent ratings increase, teacher ratings increase) negative (as parent ratings increase, teacher ratings decrease) No No 9. Do you see a relationship in the scatterplot? Yes, 10. Is this relationship weak or strong? 11. In which direction is the relationship? positive (both increase) negative (one variable increases, the other decreases)