Using the full case opinion of Wade v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (found in the Discussion Board Assignments 1-4 folder in Co

[answerhappygod]

Using the full case opinion of Wade v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.(found in the Discussion Board Assignments 1-4 folder in CourseContent in Blackboard), set forth in your own words a summary ofthe court's ruling based on the facts and each of the legal issuesin the case, which you have previously summarized. You should writea separate paragraph (at least) for the court's analysis of each ofthe separate issues that were identified in Discussion Board #2.The court's ruling can be found on page 5, paragraphs 21-23, andpage 8, paragraphs 38-44 of the opinion. However, you shouldre-read the entire opinion before beginning this assignment. Do notcopy the language of the case opinion. Use the full court opinion,not the abridged opinion in the book.
3. Did the Open and Obvious Doctrine apply as a matter of lawbecause the pothole was an "open and obvious" condition in theobjective knowledge of a reasonable person so that Wal-Mart was notliable for Wade's injuries, or was there a question of materialfact as to whether the pothole was "open and obvious"?
4. Did the Distraction Exception to the Open and ObviousDoctrine apply to the undisputed facts of this case?