Case 1: TJ International TJ International was founded in 1969 as Trus Joist International. The firm, a manufacturer of s

[answerhappygod]

Case 1 Tj International Tj International Was Founded In 1969 As Trus Joist International The Firm A Manufacturer Of S 1 (80.45 KiB) Viewed 5 times

Case 1: TJ International TJ International was founded in 1969 as Trus Joist International. The firm, a manufacturer of specialty building products, has its headquarters in Boise, Idaho. The company, through its partnership in the Trus Joist MacMillan joint venture, develops and manufactures engineered lumber. This product is a high-quality substitute for structural lumber and uses lower-grade wood and materials formerly considered waste. The company also is majority owner of the Outlook Window Partnership, which is a consortium of three wood and vinyl window manufacturers. Following is TJ International's adapted income statement and information concerning inventories from its annual report. TJ International m Sales Cost of goods sold Gross profit Selling and administrative expenses Income from operations Other expense Income before income tax Income taxes Net income $ $618,876,000 475,476,000 143,400,000 102,112,000 41,288,000 24,712,000 16,576,000 7,728,000 8,848,000
Inventories. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market and include material, labor, and production overhead costs. Inventories consisted of the following: Current Year Prior Year $23,830,000 33,244,000 Finished goods Raw materials and work-in-progress $27,512,000 34,363,000 61,875,000 Reduction to LIFO cost (5,263,000) $56,612,000 57,074,000 (3,993,000) $53,081,000 The last-in, first-out (LIFO) method is used for determining the cost of lumber, veneer, Microllam lumber, TJI joists, and open web joists. Approximately 35 percent of total inventories at the end of the current year were valued using the LIFO method. The first-in, first-out (FIFO) method is used to determine the cost of all other inventories. Instructions a. How much would income before taxes have been if FIFO costing had been used to value all inventories? b. If the income tax rate is 46.6%, what would income tax have been if FIFO costing had been used to value all inventories? In your opinion, is this difference in net income between the two methods material? Explain. c. Does the use of a different costing system for different types of inventory mean that there is a different physical flow of goods among the different types of inventory? Explain.