0.5 = Suppose that an economy has the per-worker production function given as: yt 3k where y is output per worker and k

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

0.5 = Suppose that an economy has the per-worker production function given as: yt 3k where y is output per worker and k

Post by answerhappygod »

0 5 Suppose That An Economy Has The Per Worker Production Function Given As Yt 3k Where Y Is Output Per Worker And K 1
0 5 Suppose That An Economy Has The Per Worker Production Function Given As Yt 3k Where Y Is Output Per Worker And K 1 (152.75 KiB) Viewed 30 times
0.5 = Suppose that an economy has the per-worker production function given as: yt 3k where y is output per worker and k is capital per worker. 0.30Y, where S is national savings and Y is total output. In addition, national savings is given as: St = The depreciation rate is d = 0.10 and the population growth rate is n = 0.05 The steady-state value of the capital-labor ratio, k is 36.00. The steady-state value of output per worker, y is 18.00. The steady-state value of consumption per worker, c is 12.600. Use the same production function as before, but now let the savings rate be 0.40 rather than 0.30. St = = 0.40Yt The depreciation rate is d = 0.10 and the population growth rate is n = 0.05. (Enter all responses as decimals rounded up to three places.) 9 What is the new steady-state value of the capital-labor ratio, k? What is the new steady-state value of output per worker, y? What is the new steady-state value of consumption per worker, c?
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply