Please answer all of the following questions in a paragraph or two by 11:59 p.m. on Friday, March 18. 1. If a practition

[answerhappygod]

Please answer all of the following questions in a paragraph or
two by 11:59 p.m. on Friday, March 18. 1. If a practitioner decides
to use an experimental treatment on a patient, is the practitioner
conducting research? If so, why, and what protections ought to be
given to the patient? If not, why not, and are there any special
protections that ought to be given to the patient? 2. Which of the
following: respect for persons, beneficence, or justice, seems to
you to be most important when thinking about biomedical research?
Which is least important? Explain your view. 3. Compare the “For
the Benefit of All” case to “The Price of Silence” case we covered
a few weeks ago. Are they similar in any way? Where do they differ?
In your view, should the patients in “For the Benefit of All”
participate in the study? Why or why not? 4. Would the five
criteria laid out by Levine in his commentary on "Can a Healthy
Subject Volunteer to Be Injured in Research?" prevent the subject
from donating his nerve in this case? If so, why? If not, why not?
Do you think these criteria are a good means of determining the
ethical permissibility of participation? Explain your
view.