3. Here we will adjust for confounding using stratification on the confounder. Calculate the stratum specific estimates

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

3. Here we will adjust for confounding using stratification on the confounder. Calculate the stratum specific estimates

Post by answerhappygod »

3 Here We Will Adjust For Confounding Using Stratification On The Confounder Calculate The Stratum Specific Estimates 1
3 Here We Will Adjust For Confounding Using Stratification On The Confounder Calculate The Stratum Specific Estimates 1 (49.61 KiB) Viewed 60 times
3. Here we will adjust for confounding using stratification on the confounder. Calculate the stratum specific estimates among smokers and nonsmokers from the tables below. Smokers Case (MI+, D+) Control (MI-, D-) Diabetes + (E+) 100 15 Diabetes -(E-) 500 155 Non-smokers Case (MI+, D+) Control (MI-, D-) Diabetes + (E+) 22 16 Diabetes -(E-) 990 1426 4. Is smoking a confounder of the effect of diabetes on the incidence of MI? Is this a good way to check for confounding when we are interested in causal associations? Why/why not? 5. How would you report your results for the association between diabetes and MI, taking smoking into account? How would you interpret this association?
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply